Comparing Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction of Head and Neck Cancer in PET/CT

Bao-Ngoc Huynh, Jintao Ren, Aurora Rosvoll Groendahl, Oliver Tomic, Stine Sofia Korreman*, Cecilia Marie Futsaether*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingBook chapterResearchpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prediction of cancer treatment outcomes based on baseline patient characteristics is a challenging but necessary step towards more personalized treatments with the aim of increased survival and quality of life. The HEad and neCK TumOR Segmentation Challenge (HECKTOR) 2021 comprises two major tasks: auto-segmentation of GTVt in FDG-PET/CT images and outcome prediction for oropharyngeal head and neck cancer patients. The present study compared a deep learning regressor utilizing PET/CT images to conventional machine learning methods using clinical factors and radiomics features for the patient outcome prediction task. With a concordance index of 0.64, the conventional machine learning approach trained on clinical factors had the best test performance. Team: Aarhus_Oslo.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationHead and Neck Tumor Segmentation and Outcome Prediction - 2nd Challenge, HECKTOR 2021, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Proceedings : HECKTOR 2021, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2021, Strasbourg, France, September 27, 2021, Proceedings
Number of pages9
Place of publicationCham
PublisherSpringer
Publication date13 Mar 2022
Pages318-326
ISBN (Print)978-3-030-98252-2
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-030-98253-9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 13 Mar 2022
SeriesLecture Notes in Computer Science
Volume13209
ISSN0302-9743

Keywords

  • Deep learning
  • Gross tumor volume
  • Head and neck cancer
  • Machine learning
  • Outcome prediction
  • Radiomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing Deep Learning and Conventional Machine Learning for Outcome Prediction of Head and Neck Cancer in PET/CT'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this