Combatting Online Hate: Crowd-Moderation and the Public Goods Problem

Tanja Marie Hansen*, Lasse Lindekilde, Simon Tobias Schulz Karg, Michael Bang Petersen, Stig Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Hate is widespread online, hits everyone, and carries negative consequences. Crowd moderation - user-assisted moderation through, e.g., reporting or counter-speech - is heralded as a potential remedy. We explore this potential by linking insights on online bystander interventions to the analogy of crowd moderation as a (lost) public good. We argue that the distribution of costs and benefits of engaging in crowd moderation forecasts a collective action problem. If the individual crowd member has limited incentive to react when witnessing hate, crowd moderation is unlikely to manifest. We explore this argument empirically, investigating several preregistered hypotheses about the distribution of individual-level costs and benefits of response options to online hate using a large, nationally representative survey of Danish social media users (N = 24,996). In line with expectations, we find that bystander reactions, especially costly reactions, are rare. Furthermore, we find a positive correlation between exposure to online hate and withdrawal motivations, and a negative (n-shaped) correlation with bystander reactions.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCommunications
Volume49
Issue3
Pages (from-to)444-467
Number of pages24
ISSN0341-2059
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Sept 2024

Keywords

  • bystander
  • counter-speech
  • crowd moderation
  • hate speech
  • public goods
  • reporting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Combatting Online Hate: Crowd-Moderation and the Public Goods Problem'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this