Collaborative wildlife-snow science: Integrating wildlife and snow expertise to improve research and management

A.K. Reinking*, Stine Højlund Pedersen, Kelly Elder, Natalie T. Boelman, T.W. Glass, B.A. Oates, Scott Bergen, Shane Roberts, Laura R. Prugh, Todd J. Brinkman, M.B. Coughenour, J.A. Feltner, K.J. Barker, T.W. Bentzen, Åshild Ønvik Pedersen, Niels Martin Schmidt, Glen Liston

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For wildlife inhabiting snowy environments, snow properties such as onset date, depth, strength, and distribution can influence many aspects of ecology, including movement, community dynamics, energy expenditure, and forage accessibility. As a result, snow plays a considerable role in individual fitness and ultimately population dynamics, and its evaluation is, therefore, important for comprehensive understanding of ecosystem processes in regions experiencing snow. Such understanding, and particularly study of how wildlife–snow relationships may be changing, grows more urgent as winter processes become less predictable and often more extreme under global climate change. However, studying and monitoring wildlife–snow relationships continue to be challenging because characterizing snow, an inherently complex and constantly changing environmental feature, and identifying, accessing, and applying relevant snow information at appropriate spatial and temporal scales, often require a detailed understanding of physical snow science and technologies that typically lie outside the expertise of wildlife researchers and managers. We argue that thoroughly assessing the role of snow in wildlife ecology requires substantive collaboration between researchers with expertise in each of these two fields, leveraging the discipline-specific knowledge brought by both wildlife and snow professionals. To facilitate this collaboration and encourage more effective exploration of wildlife–snow questions, we provide a five-step protocol: (1) identify relevant snow property information; (2) specify spatial, temporal, and informational requirements; (3) build the necessary datasets; (4) implement quality control procedures; and (5) incorporate snow information into wildlife analyses. Additionally, we explore the types of snow information that can be used within this collaborative framework. We illustrate, in the context of two examples, field observations, remote-sensing datasets, and four example modeling tools that simulate spatiotemporal snow property distributions and, in some cases, evolutions. For each type of snow data, we highlight the collaborative opportunities for wildlife and snow professionals when designing snow data collection efforts, processing snow remote sensing products, producing tailored snow datasets, and applying the resulting snow information in wildlife analyses. We seek to provide a clear path for wildlife professionals to address wildlife–snow questions and improve ecological inference by integrating the best available snow science through collaboration with snow professionals.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere4094
JournalEcosphere (Washington, D.C.)
Volume13
Issue6
ISSN2150-8925
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2022

Keywords

  • SnowModel
  • collaboration
  • data–model fusion
  • interdisciplinary
  • snow data
  • snow modeling
  • wildlife ecology
  • wildlife management
  • wildlife research
  • wildlife–snow
  • winter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Collaborative wildlife-snow science: Integrating wildlife and snow expertise to improve research and management'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this