Chronic lipopolysaccharide infusion fails to induce depressive-like behaviour in adult male rats

Christina Weide Fischer, Nico Liebenberg, Anne Mette Madsen, Heidi Kaastrup Müller, Sten Lund, Gregers Wegener

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic inflammation is implicated in numerous diseases, including major depression and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Since depression and T2DM often co-exist, inflammatory pathways are suggested as a possible link. Hence, the establishment of an immune-mediated animal model would shed light on mechanisms possibly linking depression and metabolic alterations.

OBJECTIVE: In this study we investigated a behavioural and metabolic paradigm following chronic infusion with low doses of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) using osmotic minipumps in male rats.

METHODS: Behavioural testing consisted of evaluating activity level in the open field and depressive-like behaviour in the forced swim test. Metabolic assessment included measurement of body weight, food and water intake, and glucose and insulin levels during an oral glucose tolerance test.

RESULTS: LPS-infused rats showed acute signs of sickness behaviour, but chronic LPS infusion did not induce behavioural or metabolic changes.

CONCLUSION: These results suggest that although inflammation is immediately induced as indicated by acute sickness, 4 weeks of chronic LPS administration via osmotic minipumps did not result in behavioural changes. Therefore, this paradigm may not be a suitable model for studying the underlying mechanisms that link depression and T2DM.

Original languageEnglish
JournalActa Neuropsychiatrica (Print)
Volume27
Issue3
Pages (from-to)189
Number of pages194
ISSN0924-2708
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2015

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chronic lipopolysaccharide infusion fails to induce depressive-like behaviour in adult male rats'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this