Charred or fragmented, yet comparable: Quantifying dental surface dissimilarity across teeth, jaws, and heat exposure

Anika Kofod Petersen*, Scheila Mânica, Andrew Forgie, Richard Boyle, Hemlata Pandey, Palle Villesen, Line Staun Larsen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Accurate dental matching is essential for forensic identification, particularly in challenging cases involving dentitions with no dental work, incomplete dentitions or damaged remains. This study evaluates similarity scoring schemes for 3D dental data using three datasets: full jaws versus single teeth (DATA-A), and two collections of heat-traumatized teeth (DATA-B and DATA-C). The similarity scores are assessed for their ability to quantify tooth curvature (dis)similarity and distinguish matching from mismatching dental comparisons. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the methods in handling dental fragmentation (ROC-AUCDATA-A = 0.899 (95 % CI 0.840–0.948) and heat trauma (ROC-AUC DATA-B = 0.996 (95 % CI 0.98–1.00); ROC-AUC DATA-C = 0.993 (95 % CI 0.980–1.00), and that they offer a robust tool for forensic applications.

Original languageEnglish
Article number112577
JournalForensic Science International
Volume375
Number of pages7
ISSN0379-0738
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2025

Keywords

  • 3D dental comparison
  • Biometric identification
  • Disaster victim identification
  • Forensic odontology identification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Charred or fragmented, yet comparable: Quantifying dental surface dissimilarity across teeth, jaws, and heat exposure'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this