Can Warm Behavior Mitigate the Negative Effect of Unfavorable Governmental Decisions on Citizens’ Trust?

Frederik Godt Hansen

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)
13 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

For decades, scholars have discussed how to build greater citizen trust in government. I hypothesize that to increase trust in government, we should consider whether decisions made in bureaucrat-citizen encounters (e.g. applications for welfare benefits) are favorable to citizens. Building on insights from social psychology, I argue that in cases where citizens are presented with unfavorable decisions (e.g. rejection of applications), public employees can mitigate the negative impact on trust in government by appearing warm and friendly in the decision-making process. The argument is tested in a large-scale randomized survey experiment on a representative sample of Danish citizens, where I manipulate decision favorability and warmth. The findings reveal that outcome favorability and warmth strongly influence citizens' trust in government.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Experimental Political Science
Volume10
Issue1
Pages (from-to)62-75
Number of pages14
ISSN2052-2630
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Warmth
  • citizen-state encounter
  • political trust
  • survey experiment
  • trust in government

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can Warm Behavior Mitigate the Negative Effect of Unfavorable Governmental Decisions on Citizens’ Trust?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this