Buy, eat or discard? A case study with apples to explore fruit quality perception and food waste

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Sara R Jaeger, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research , New Zealand
  • Leandro Machín, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
  • Jessica Aschemann-Witzel
  • Lucía Antúnez, Universidad de la República, Uruguay
  • Frederick Roger Harker, The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited, New Zealand
  • Gastón Ares, Universidad de la República, Uruguay

Consumers’ perceptions of the quality of fresh produce at the point of purchase and point of consumption play an important role in decisions about what to buy, eat and discard. Apple images were used to assess the extent that defects (bruising, splitting, and crushing) attracted consumers’ visual attention as measured using eye tracking and related to choices to buy and to eat the apples. For an internal defect (internal browning and cavities) that is usually only evident after biting into the apples, images were used to determine whether consumers would discard a portion or all of the apple and to assess their perceived quality and sensory expectations using a RATA question. Eye-tracking demonstrated that damage to the exterior of apples and internal browning rapidly attracted consumers’ visual attention. Choice of apples with external defects at both point-of-purchase and point-of-consumption was low and ranging from 0% to 7% and 3.4 to 15.1%, respectively. Consumer decisions to discard apples with internal browning was nuanced in that (1) small amounts of browning did not lead to disposal, (2) when the relative area of browning reached 8.2% then 50% of consumers would throw away a portion of each apple, and (3) when browning was more severe (34.6% relative area) then 50% of the consumers indicated that they would throw away the whole apple. The presence of internal browning lowered consumers’ perceived quality and sensory expectations, as evidenced by the increase in RATA ratings of negative terms (e.g., disgusting, rotten, bruised, mealy) and the lowered RATA ratings for the terms natural and healthy. From a perspective of reducing food waste, the results stress that strategies are needed to increase value perception of defective fruits to increase likely purchase and consumption.

Original languageEnglish
JournalFood Quality and Preference
Volume69
Pages (from-to)10-20
Number of pages11
ISSN0950-3293
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Research areas

  • Apple, Bruising, Eye-tracking, Food waste, Internal browning, Quality

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 127849434