Buddha as a god: An empirical assessment

Benjamin Grant Purzycki, Edward C. Holland

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

For at least a century, scholars have argued about whether or not Buddha is considered a god. We treat this question empirically by conducting two ethnographic studies among residents of the Tyva Republic, one of the Buddhist republics in the Russian Federation. Using a mixed methods approach to interrogate the question, this report concludes that Buddha is, in fact, popularly represented as a punitive and moralistic supernatural agent in the republic and demographic factors co-vary with such beliefs. The paper addresses longstanding concerns and situates the results in contemporary social scientific inquiry that addresses questions of when, where, to what degree, and why he is represented as a deity.
Original languageEnglish
JournalMethod and Theory in the Study of Religion
Volume31
Issue4-5
Pages (from-to)347-375
ISSN0943-3058
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2019
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Buddhism
  • ethnographic methods
  • cognitive anthropology
  • Tyva Republic
  • gods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Buddha as a god: An empirical assessment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this