Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Stefan James*, Sasha Koul, Jonas Andersson, Oskar Angerås, Pallonji Bhiladvala, Fredrik Calais, Mikael Danielewicz, Ole Fröbert, Per Grimfjärd, Matthias Götberg, Loghman Henareh, Dan Ioanes, Jens Jensen, Rikard Linder, Pontus Lindroos, Elmir Omerovic, Georgios Panayi, Truls Råmunddal, Giovanna Sarno, Anders UlvenstamSebastian Völtz, Henrik Wagner, Helena Wikström, Ollie Östlund, David Erlinge

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Bivalirudin was not superior to unfractionated heparin in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and no planned use of GPI (glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) in contemporary clinical practice of radial access and potent P2Y12-inhibitors in the VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART randomized clinical trial (Bivalirudin Versus Heparin in STEMI and NSTEMI Patients on Modern Antiplatelet Therapy-Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies Registry). Methods: In this prespecified separately powered subgroup analysis, we included patients with ST-segment-elevation MI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with the primary composite end point of all-cause death, MI, or major bleeding event within 180 days. Results: Among the 6006 patients enrolled in the trial, 3005 patients with ST-segment-elevation MI were randomized to receive bivalirudin or heparin. The mean age was 66.8 years. According to protocol recommendations, 87% were treated with potent oral P2Y12-inhibitors before start of angiography and radial access was used in 90%. GPI was used in 51 (3.4%) and 74 (4.9%) of patients randomized to receive bivalirudin and heparin, respectively. The primary end point occurred in 12.5% (187 of 1501) and 13.0% (196 of 1504; hazard ratio [HR], 0.95 [95% CI, 0.78-1.17], P=0.64) with consistent results in all major subgroups. All-cause death occurred in 3.9% versus 3.9% (HR, 1.00 [0.70-1.45], P=0.98), MI in 1.7% versus 2.2% (HR, 0.76 [0.45-1.28], P=0.30), major bleeding in 8.3% versus 8.0% (HR, 1.04 [0.81-1.33], P=0.78), and definite stent thrombosis in 0.5% versus 1.3% (HR, 0.42 [0.18-0.96], P=0.04). Conclusions: In patients with ST-segment-elevation MI undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention with radial access and receiving current recommended treatments with potent P2Y12-inhibitors rate of the composite of all-cause death, MI, or major bleeding was not lower in those randomized to receive bivalirudin as compared with heparin. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT02311231.

Original languageEnglish
JournalCirculation. Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume14
Issue12
Pages (from-to)E008969
ISSN1941-7640
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Dec 2021
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • bivalirudin
  • heparin
  • myocardial infarction
  • stent
  • thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bivalirudin Versus Heparin Monotherapy in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this