Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Bias as an epistemic notion

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Once one abandons the ideal of value-free and impartial science, the question of how to distinguish biased from legitimately value-laden science arises. To approach this “new demarcation problem”, I argue that one should distinguish different uses of “bias” in a first step: a narrow sense of bias in statistics (often described as “systematic deviation from the truth”), and a wider sense of the term covering any kind of tendency that may impact scientific reasoning. Secondly, the narrow sense exemplifies an ontological notion of bias, which understands bias in terms of deviation from an impartial ideal outcome. I propose to replace it with an epistemic notion of bias, which understands biased research as research that we have good reasons to suspect could have been (done) systematically better. From a socio-epistemic perspective, such good reasons to expect better can be found in a lack of responsiveness to conventional standards and/or critical discourse in the scientific community. In short, bias in an epistemic sense consists in a deviation, not from truth but from current best practice. While this turns bias into something that is dependent on time and context, it can illuminate the new demarcation problem by allowing to distinguishing between biased and legitimately value-laden research.
Original languageEnglish
Book seriesStudies in History and Philosophy of Science
Volume91
Pages (from-to)307-315
Number of pages9
ISSN1871-7381
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Feb 2022

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 226344149