Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Standard

Between Theory and Practice : Bridging Concepts in HCI research. / Dindler, Christian; Dalsgaard, Peter.

ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vol. 14 Association for Computing Machinery, 2014. p. 1635-1644 .

Research output: Contribution to book/anthology/report/proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Dindler, C & Dalsgaard, P 2014, Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research. in ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. vol. 14, Association for Computing Machinery, pp. 1635-1644 , ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Toronto, Canada, 26/04/2014. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342

APA

Dindler, C., & Dalsgaard, P. (2014). Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vol. 14, pp. 1635-1644 ). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342

CBE

Dindler C, Dalsgaard P. 2014. Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. pp. 1635-1644 . https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342

MLA

Dindler, Christian and Peter Dalsgaard "Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research". ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Association for Computing Machinery. 2014, 1635-1644 . https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342

Vancouver

Dindler C, Dalsgaard P. Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research. In ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vol. 14. Association for Computing Machinery. 2014. p. 1635-1644 https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557342

Author

Dindler, Christian ; Dalsgaard, Peter. / Between Theory and Practice : Bridging Concepts in HCI research. ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vol. 14 Association for Computing Machinery, 2014. pp. 1635-1644

Bibtex

@inproceedings{4710403b287e49f781dc1de971245a7e,
title = "Between Theory and Practice: Bridging Concepts in HCI research",
abstract = "We present the notion of ‘bridging concepts’ as a particular form of intermediary knowledge in HCI research, residing between theory and practice. We argue that bridging concepts address the challenge of facilitating exchange between theory and practice in HCI, and we compare it to other intermediary forms of knowledge such as strong concepts and conceptual constructs. We propose that bridging concepts have three defining constituents: a theoretical foundation, a set of design articulations and a range of exemplars that demonstrate the scope and potential of their application. These constituents specify how bridging concepts, as a form of knowledge, are accountable to both theory and practice. We present an analysis of the concept of ‘peepholes’ as an example of a bridging concept aimed at spurring user curiosity and engagement.",
author = "Christian Dindler and Peter Dalsgaard",
year = "2014",
doi = "10.1145/2556288.2557342",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
pages = "1635--1644",
booktitle = "ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems",
publisher = "Association for Computing Machinery",

}

RIS

TY - GEN

T1 - Between Theory and Practice

T2 - Bridging Concepts in HCI research

AU - Dindler, Christian

AU - Dalsgaard, Peter

PY - 2014

Y1 - 2014

N2 - We present the notion of ‘bridging concepts’ as a particular form of intermediary knowledge in HCI research, residing between theory and practice. We argue that bridging concepts address the challenge of facilitating exchange between theory and practice in HCI, and we compare it to other intermediary forms of knowledge such as strong concepts and conceptual constructs. We propose that bridging concepts have three defining constituents: a theoretical foundation, a set of design articulations and a range of exemplars that demonstrate the scope and potential of their application. These constituents specify how bridging concepts, as a form of knowledge, are accountable to both theory and practice. We present an analysis of the concept of ‘peepholes’ as an example of a bridging concept aimed at spurring user curiosity and engagement.

AB - We present the notion of ‘bridging concepts’ as a particular form of intermediary knowledge in HCI research, residing between theory and practice. We argue that bridging concepts address the challenge of facilitating exchange between theory and practice in HCI, and we compare it to other intermediary forms of knowledge such as strong concepts and conceptual constructs. We propose that bridging concepts have three defining constituents: a theoretical foundation, a set of design articulations and a range of exemplars that demonstrate the scope and potential of their application. These constituents specify how bridging concepts, as a form of knowledge, are accountable to both theory and practice. We present an analysis of the concept of ‘peepholes’ as an example of a bridging concept aimed at spurring user curiosity and engagement.

U2 - 10.1145/2556288.2557342

DO - 10.1145/2556288.2557342

M3 - Article in proceedings

VL - 14

SP - 1635

EP - 1644

BT - ACM CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

PB - Association for Computing Machinery

ER -