School of Communication and Culture

TY - ABST

T1 - Balancing Privacy, Dignity and Safety in the use of Surveillance Technologies for the Care of Elderly with Dementia

AU - Albrechtslund, Anders

AU - Meyer, Astrid

AU - Aaløkke, Stinne Ballegaard

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - This paper offers an ethical analysis of a case study focusing on the use of surveillance technologies for the care of elderly with dementia at a nursing home in Denmark. The tendency to wander away from home is a dangerous and recurring event at the care center, and it is crucial for the care staff to manage and, if possible, even prevent this from happening. Care centers try to provide solutions through different methods, including using technologies for monitoring and tracking individuals.However, a number of difficulties can be identified, not simply concerning legal limitations or technological challenges, but more importantly about sustaining a secure and dignified life for elderly with dementia. How can we create safety and security for citizens with dementia while still protecting their dignity and privacy? The technologies available to prevent wandering may create unwanted knowledge which can violate an individual’s privacy (Macklin, 2003). The care staff may also become participants in a surveillance situation in which they risk losing their autonomy at work. As such, surveillance technologies come with ethical ambivalence. As instruments of both control and care, it can often be difficult to draw the line between acceptable and unwarranted surveillance (Lyon, 2001). The use of surveillance technologies thus requires ethical decision, as it creates ethical scenarios which must be considered (Albrechtslund, 2007).In the paper, we discuss the possible balance between ethical and safety concerns in using surveillance technologies in the care for elderly with dementia, and we investigate approaches to and materials for involving care staff and other relevant actors in considering the ethical dilemmas in the care for dementia patients.References:Albrechtslund, A. (2007). Ethics and Technology Design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(1), 63–72.Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance Society. Buckingham: Open University.Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a Useless Concept: It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 327(7429), 1419.

AB - This paper offers an ethical analysis of a case study focusing on the use of surveillance technologies for the care of elderly with dementia at a nursing home in Denmark. The tendency to wander away from home is a dangerous and recurring event at the care center, and it is crucial for the care staff to manage and, if possible, even prevent this from happening. Care centers try to provide solutions through different methods, including using technologies for monitoring and tracking individuals.However, a number of difficulties can be identified, not simply concerning legal limitations or technological challenges, but more importantly about sustaining a secure and dignified life for elderly with dementia. How can we create safety and security for citizens with dementia while still protecting their dignity and privacy? The technologies available to prevent wandering may create unwanted knowledge which can violate an individual’s privacy (Macklin, 2003). The care staff may also become participants in a surveillance situation in which they risk losing their autonomy at work. As such, surveillance technologies come with ethical ambivalence. As instruments of both control and care, it can often be difficult to draw the line between acceptable and unwarranted surveillance (Lyon, 2001). The use of surveillance technologies thus requires ethical decision, as it creates ethical scenarios which must be considered (Albrechtslund, 2007).In the paper, we discuss the possible balance between ethical and safety concerns in using surveillance technologies in the care for elderly with dementia, and we investigate approaches to and materials for involving care staff and other relevant actors in considering the ethical dilemmas in the care for dementia patients.References:Albrechtslund, A. (2007). Ethics and Technology Design. Ethics and Information Technology, 9(1), 63–72.Lyon, D. (2001). Surveillance Society. Buckingham: Open University.Macklin, R. (2003). Dignity is a Useless Concept: It means no more than respect for persons or their autonomy. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 327(7429), 1419.

KW - Dementia

M3 - Konferenceabstrakt til konference

Y2 - 28 June 2021 through 30 June 2021

ER -