Attention, Predation, Counterintuition: Why Dracula Won't Die

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review


Bram Stoker’s seminal horror novel Dracula (1897) has been subjected to a vast number of different critical readings, many of which are deeply flawed, e.g. by proceeding from defunct psychological theories. Incorporating recent advances in evolutionary social science, I offer a biocultural reading of Dracula to account for the novel’s impact and resilience. Dracula connected squarely with late-Victorian anxieties, but the novel also appeals to trans-historical adaptive dispositions. I analyze Stoker’s use of narrative strategies to grab and sustain attention, and Count Dracula as a supercharged predator, a counterintuitive monster well-designed to engage attention and spark the imagination.
Original languageEnglish
JournalStyle (DeKalb)
Pages (from-to)378-398
Number of pages21
Publication statusPublished - 2012

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

Press/Media items

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 45263990