Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation. / Jensen, Thomas; Thrane, Pernille Gro; Olesen, Kevin Kris Warnakula et al.

In: European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy, 2023.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Jensen T, Thrane PG, Olesen KKW, Würtz M, Mortensen MB, Gyldenkerne C et al. Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation. European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy. 2023. Epub 2023. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac058

Author

Bibtex

@article{9eb5a09e316742a4abfa095dd6fb12e6,
title = "Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation",
abstract = "AIMS: Beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), guidelines recommend anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) rather than dual therapy with an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet drug. The risks and benefits of this strategy, however, remain uncertain. We examined hospitalization for bleeding and ischemic risk beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with AF treated with monotherapy versus dual therapy. Furthermore, among patients treated with monotherapy, we compared direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy.METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI between 2003 and 2017 from the Western Denmark Heart Registry and followed them for up to 4 years. Follow-up started 15 months after PCI to enable assessment of medical treatment after 12 months. Using a Cox regression model, we computed weighted hazard ratios (HRw) of hospitalization for bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Analyses comparing monotherapy versus dual therapy included 3331 patients, and analyses comparing DOAC versus VKA monotherapy included 1275 patients. Risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.09) and MACE (HRw 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19) were similar with monotherapy and dual therapy. Similarly, risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 1.27, 95% CI 0.84-1.92) and MACE (HRw 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.50) were equal with DOAC and VKA monotherapy.CONCLUSION: Our results support long-term OAC monotherapy beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with atrial fibrillation and suggest that DOAC monotherapy is as safe and effective as VKA monotherapy.",
author = "Thomas Jensen and Thrane, {Pernille Gro} and Olesen, {Kevin Kris Warnakula} and Morten W{\"u}rtz and Mortensen, {Martin B{\o}dtker} and Christine Gyldenkerne and Troels Thim and N{\o}rgaard, {Bjarne Linde} and Jensen, {Jesper M{\o}ller} and Kristensen, {Steen Dalby} and Nielsen, {Jens Cosedis} and Eikelboom, {John W} and Michael Maeng",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac058",
language = "English",
journal = "European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy",
issn = "2055-6837",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Antithrombotic treatment beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with atrial fibrillation

AU - Jensen, Thomas

AU - Thrane, Pernille Gro

AU - Olesen, Kevin Kris Warnakula

AU - Würtz, Morten

AU - Mortensen, Martin Bødtker

AU - Gyldenkerne, Christine

AU - Thim, Troels

AU - Nørgaard, Bjarne Linde

AU - Jensen, Jesper Møller

AU - Kristensen, Steen Dalby

AU - Nielsen, Jens Cosedis

AU - Eikelboom, John W

AU - Maeng, Michael

N1 - © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - AIMS: Beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), guidelines recommend anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) rather than dual therapy with an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet drug. The risks and benefits of this strategy, however, remain uncertain. We examined hospitalization for bleeding and ischemic risk beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with AF treated with monotherapy versus dual therapy. Furthermore, among patients treated with monotherapy, we compared direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy.METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI between 2003 and 2017 from the Western Denmark Heart Registry and followed them for up to 4 years. Follow-up started 15 months after PCI to enable assessment of medical treatment after 12 months. Using a Cox regression model, we computed weighted hazard ratios (HRw) of hospitalization for bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Analyses comparing monotherapy versus dual therapy included 3331 patients, and analyses comparing DOAC versus VKA monotherapy included 1275 patients. Risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.09) and MACE (HRw 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19) were similar with monotherapy and dual therapy. Similarly, risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 1.27, 95% CI 0.84-1.92) and MACE (HRw 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.50) were equal with DOAC and VKA monotherapy.CONCLUSION: Our results support long-term OAC monotherapy beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with atrial fibrillation and suggest that DOAC monotherapy is as safe and effective as VKA monotherapy.

AB - AIMS: Beyond 1 year after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), guidelines recommend anticoagulant monotherapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) rather than dual therapy with an anticoagulant and an antiplatelet drug. The risks and benefits of this strategy, however, remain uncertain. We examined hospitalization for bleeding and ischemic risk beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with AF treated with monotherapy versus dual therapy. Furthermore, among patients treated with monotherapy, we compared direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) therapy and vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy.METHODS AND RESULTS: We included all patients with AF undergoing first-time PCI between 2003 and 2017 from the Western Denmark Heart Registry and followed them for up to 4 years. Follow-up started 15 months after PCI to enable assessment of medical treatment after 12 months. Using a Cox regression model, we computed weighted hazard ratios (HRw) of hospitalization for bleeding and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Analyses comparing monotherapy versus dual therapy included 3331 patients, and analyses comparing DOAC versus VKA monotherapy included 1275 patients. Risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.75-1.09) and MACE (HRw 1.04, 95% CI 0.90-1.19) were similar with monotherapy and dual therapy. Similarly, risks of hospitalization for bleeding (HRw 1.27, 95% CI 0.84-1.92) and MACE (HRw 1.15, 95% CI 0.87-1.50) were equal with DOAC and VKA monotherapy.CONCLUSION: Our results support long-term OAC monotherapy beyond 1 year after PCI in patients with atrial fibrillation and suggest that DOAC monotherapy is as safe and effective as VKA monotherapy.

U2 - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac058

DO - 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvac058

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36269306

JO - European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy

JF - European heart journal. Cardiovascular pharmacotherapy

SN - 2055-6837

ER -