Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Antiepileptic drugs prescribed in pregnancy and prevalence of major congenital malformations: comparative prevalence studies

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Irene Petersen, UCL, University College London, University of London, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth
  • ,
  • Shuk-Li Collings, OXON Epidemiol
  • ,
  • Rachel L. McCrea, UCL, University College London, University of London, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth
  • ,
  • Irwin Nazareth, UCL, University College London, University of London, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth
  • ,
  • David P. Osborn, UCL, University College London, University of London, Div Psychiat
  • ,
  • Phil J. Cowen, Univ Oxford, University of Oxford, Warneford Hosp, Dept Psychiat
  • ,
  • Cormac J. Sammon, UCL, University College London, University of London, Dept Primary Care & Populat Hlth

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence of major congenital malformations associated with antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in pregnancy.

Patients and methods: Using data from The Health Improvement Network, we identified women who have given live birth and their offspring. Four subgroups were selected based on the AED treatment in early pregnancy, valproate, carbamazepine, lamotrigine and women not receiving AED treatment. We compared the prevalence of major congenital malformations within children of these four groups and estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) using Poisson regression adjusted for maternal age, sex of child, quintiles of Townsend deprivation score and indication for treatment.

Results: In total, 240,071 women were included in the study. A total of 229 women were prescribed valproate in pregnancy, 357 were prescribed lamotrigine and 334 were prescribed carbamazepine and 239,151 women were not prescribed AEDs. Fifteen out of 229 (6.6%) women prescribed valproate gave birth to a child with a major congenital malformation. The figures for lamotrigine, carbamazepine and women not prescribed AEDs were 2.7%, 3.3% and 2.2%, respectively. The prevalence of major congenital malformation was similar for women prescribed lamotrigine or carbamazepine compared to women with no AED treatment in pregnancy. For women prescribed valproate in polytherapy, the prevalence was fourfold higher. After adjustments, the effect of estimates attenuated, but the prevalence remained two-to threefold higher in women prescribed valproate.

Conclusion: The results of our study suggest that lamotrigine and carbamazepine are safer treatment options than valproate in pregnancy and should be considered as alternative treatment options for women of childbearing potential and in pregnancy.

Original languageEnglish
JournalClinical epidemiology
Volume9
Pages (from-to)95-103
Number of pages9
ISSN1179-1349
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

    Research areas

  • pregnancy, valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, adverse drug effects, PRIMARY-CARE, COMPARATIVE COHORT, HEALTH RECORDS, LAMOTRIGINE, WOMEN, RISK, UK, EPILEPSY, CARBAMAZEPINE, DATABASES

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 121761157