Aarhus University Seal

An ecosystem-scale litter and microplastics monitoring plan under the Arctic Monitoring and Assessment Programme (AMAP)

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review


  • Jennifer Provencher, Environment Canada
  • ,
  • Tanja Kögel, University of Bergen, Institute of Marine Research
  • ,
  • Amy Lusher, Institute of Marine Research, Norwegian Institute for Water Research
  • ,
  • Katrin Vorkamp
  • Alessio Gomiero, Norwegian Research Centre (NORCE)
  • ,
  • Ilka Peeken, Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research
  • ,
  • Maria Granberg, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
  • ,
  • Sjúrður Hammer, The Faroese Environment Agency
  • ,
  • Julia Baak, McGill University
  • ,
  • Jan Rene Larsen, Norwegian Polar Institute
  • ,
  • Eivind Farmen, Norwegian Environment Agency

Lack of knowledge on levels and trends of litter and microplastics in the Arctic, is limiting our understanding of the sources, transport, fate, and effects is hampering global activities aimed at reducing litter and microplastics in the environment. To obtain a holistic view to managing litter and microplastics in the Arctic, we considered the current state of knowledge and methods for litter and microplastics monitoring in eleven environmental compartments representing the marine, freshwater, terrestrial, and atmospheric environments. Based on available harmonized methods, and existing data in the Arctic, we recommend prioritization of implementing litter and microplastics monitoring in the Arctic in four Priority 1 compartments —water, aquatic sediments, shorelines, and seabirds. One or several of these compartments should be monitored to provide benchmark data for litter and microplastics in the Arctic and, in the future, data on spatial and temporal trends. For the other environmental compartments, methods should be refined for future sources and surveillance monitoring, as well as monitoring of effects. Implementation of the monitoring activities should include community-based local components where possible. While organized as national and regional programs, monitoring of litter and microplastics in the Arctic should be coordinated, with a view to future pan-Arctic assessments.

Original languageEnglish
JournalArctic Science
Pages (from-to)1067-1081
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2022

    Research areas

  • Arctic, baseline, debris, monitoring, spatial and temporal trends

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 294111588