Department of Political Science

Against the family veto in organ procurement: Why the wishes of the dead should prevail when the living and the deceased disagree on organ donation

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

The wishes of registered organ donors are regularly set aside when family members object to donation. This genuine overruling of the wishes of the deceased raises difficult ethical questions. A successful argument for providing the family with a veto must (a) provide reason to disregard the wishes of the dead, and (b) establish why the family should be allowed to decide. One branch of justification seeks to reconcile the family veto with important ideas about respecting property rights, preserving autonomy, and preventing harm. These arguments are ultimately unsuccessful. Another branch of arguments is consequentialist, pointing out the negative consequences of removing the veto. Whether construed as concerning family distress or as a potential drop in the organs available, these arguments are unsuccessful; the first fails to recognize the tremendous distress associated with waiting for an organ, while the second has little supporting evidence. A final section considers and rejects whether combining some of the arguments just examined could justify the family veto. We should thus remove the family veto in organ donation.

Original languageEnglish
JournalBioethics
Volume34
Issue3
Pages (from-to)272-280
Number of pages9
ISSN0269-9702
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Mar 2020
EventÅrsmøde Dansk Selskab for Statskundskab - Hotel Koldingfjord, Kolding, Denmark
Duration: 29 Oct 201530 Oct 2015

Conference

ConferenceÅrsmøde Dansk Selskab for Statskundskab
LocationHotel Koldingfjord
CountryDenmark
CityKolding
Period29/10/201530/10/2015

    Research areas

  • Family veto, organ donation, organ shortage, family veto, autonomy of the dead, family refusal, organ procurement, organ transplantation, first-person authorization, DONOR, PRESUMED CONSENT, TISSUE, TRANSPLANTATION, DECISIONS, RESPECT, WOULD, BEREAVED FAMILIES

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

Activities

Projects

ID: 157532447