Acceptable gaps in mathematical proofs

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Mathematicians often intentionally leave gaps in their proofs. Based on interviews with mathematicians about their refereeing practices, this paper examines the character of intentional gaps in published proofs. We observe that mathematicians’ refereeing practices limit the number of certain intentional gaps in published proofs. The results provide some new perspectives on the traditional philosophical questions of the nature of proof and of what grounds mathematical knowledge.

Original languageEnglish
JournalSynthese
Volume197
Pages (from-to)233-247
ISSN0039-7857
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

    Research areas

  • Gaps in proofs, Mathematical practice, Peer review in mathematics, The nature of proofs

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 127225401