A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era

Mette Lise Lousdal; Timothy L Lash; W Dana Flanders; M Alan Brookhart; Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen; Peter Vedsted; Henrik Støvring

doi:10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era

Mette Lise Lousdal, Timothy L Lash, W Dana Flanders, M Alan Brookhart, Ivar Sønbø Kristiansen, Peter Vedsted, Henrik Støvring

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in breast cancer therapy since the randomized controlled trials of mammography screening might have reduced the screening benefit. Most observational studies of mammography effectiveness would be confounded by these improvements and other factors. Using a design resistant to this confounding, we evaluated whether mammography in asymptomatic women reduces breast cancer mortality during the treatment era succeeding the trials.

METHODS: We designed a quasi-experimental cohort study in regions of Denmark without organized screening. We predicted the number of expected mammograms for each general practice based on observed numbers of mammograms and individual risk factors. Regardless of a woman's individual exposure to mammography, we assigned her the ratio of observed to expected mammograms of her general practice as her instrumental variable. We employed this potential instrumental variable as mammography exposure status and followed women from January 1, 2006 until death, emigration, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first.

RESULTS: We included 169,197 women aged 50-66 from 738 general practices and without previous breast cancer as of January 1, 2006. Women affiliated with a practice referring more women than expected, compared with less, had a lower hazard of breast cancer death (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.95). Negative control associations were near null, suggesting no confounding bias.

CONCLUSIONS: This quasi-experimental study estimated a continued protective effect of mammography in women where most were presumably asymptomatic. In contrast to conventional observational studies, the use of practice referral ratio as an instrumental variable may avoid bias from uncontrolled confounding.

Original language	English
Article number	10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841
Journal	Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
ISSN	1044-3983
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841
Publication status	E-pub / Early view - 24 Jan 2025

Keywords

Breast neoplasms/mortality
Breast neoplasms/prevention and control
Confounding Factors
Epidemiologic.
Epidemiology/methods
Mammography

Access to Document

10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

Cite this

Lousdal, M. L., Lash, T. L., Flanders, W. D., Brookhart, M. A., Kristiansen, I. S., Vedsted, P., & Støvring, H. (2025). A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era. Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), Article 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

@article{0d23d7acd08f48f8a5e7309929b75ea3,

title = "A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era",

abstract = "BACKGROUND: Improvements in breast cancer therapy since the randomized controlled trials of mammography screening might have reduced the screening benefit. Most observational studies of mammography effectiveness would be confounded by these improvements and other factors. Using a design resistant to this confounding, we evaluated whether mammography in asymptomatic women reduces breast cancer mortality during the treatment era succeeding the trials.METHODS: We designed a quasi-experimental cohort study in regions of Denmark without organized screening. We predicted the number of expected mammograms for each general practice based on observed numbers of mammograms and individual risk factors. Regardless of a woman's individual exposure to mammography, we assigned her the ratio of observed to expected mammograms of her general practice as her instrumental variable. We employed this potential instrumental variable as mammography exposure status and followed women from January 1, 2006 until death, emigration, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first.RESULTS: We included 169,197 women aged 50-66 from 738 general practices and without previous breast cancer as of January 1, 2006. Women affiliated with a practice referring more women than expected, compared with less, had a lower hazard of breast cancer death (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.95). Negative control associations were near null, suggesting no confounding bias.CONCLUSIONS: This quasi-experimental study estimated a continued protective effect of mammography in women where most were presumably asymptomatic. In contrast to conventional observational studies, the use of practice referral ratio as an instrumental variable may avoid bias from uncontrolled confounding.",

keywords = "Breast neoplasms/mortality, Breast neoplasms/prevention and control, Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic., Epidemiology/methods, Mammography",

author = "Lousdal, {Mette Lise} and Lash, {Timothy L} and Flanders, {W Dana} and Brookhart, {M Alan} and Kristiansen, {Ivar S{\o}nb{\o}} and Peter Vedsted and Henrik St{\o}vring",

year = "2025",

month = jan,

day = "24",

doi = "10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841",

language = "English",

journal = "Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)",

issn = "1044-3983",

publisher = "Lippincott Williams and Wilkins Ltd.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era

AU - Lousdal, Mette Lise

AU - Lash, Timothy L

AU - Flanders, W Dana

AU - Brookhart, M Alan

AU - Kristiansen, Ivar Sønbø

AU - Vedsted, Peter

AU - Støvring, Henrik

PY - 2025/1/24

Y1 - 2025/1/24

N2 - BACKGROUND: Improvements in breast cancer therapy since the randomized controlled trials of mammography screening might have reduced the screening benefit. Most observational studies of mammography effectiveness would be confounded by these improvements and other factors. Using a design resistant to this confounding, we evaluated whether mammography in asymptomatic women reduces breast cancer mortality during the treatment era succeeding the trials.METHODS: We designed a quasi-experimental cohort study in regions of Denmark without organized screening. We predicted the number of expected mammograms for each general practice based on observed numbers of mammograms and individual risk factors. Regardless of a woman's individual exposure to mammography, we assigned her the ratio of observed to expected mammograms of her general practice as her instrumental variable. We employed this potential instrumental variable as mammography exposure status and followed women from January 1, 2006 until death, emigration, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first.RESULTS: We included 169,197 women aged 50-66 from 738 general practices and without previous breast cancer as of January 1, 2006. Women affiliated with a practice referring more women than expected, compared with less, had a lower hazard of breast cancer death (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.95). Negative control associations were near null, suggesting no confounding bias.CONCLUSIONS: This quasi-experimental study estimated a continued protective effect of mammography in women where most were presumably asymptomatic. In contrast to conventional observational studies, the use of practice referral ratio as an instrumental variable may avoid bias from uncontrolled confounding.

AB - BACKGROUND: Improvements in breast cancer therapy since the randomized controlled trials of mammography screening might have reduced the screening benefit. Most observational studies of mammography effectiveness would be confounded by these improvements and other factors. Using a design resistant to this confounding, we evaluated whether mammography in asymptomatic women reduces breast cancer mortality during the treatment era succeeding the trials.METHODS: We designed a quasi-experimental cohort study in regions of Denmark without organized screening. We predicted the number of expected mammograms for each general practice based on observed numbers of mammograms and individual risk factors. Regardless of a woman's individual exposure to mammography, we assigned her the ratio of observed to expected mammograms of her general practice as her instrumental variable. We employed this potential instrumental variable as mammography exposure status and followed women from January 1, 2006 until death, emigration, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first.RESULTS: We included 169,197 women aged 50-66 from 738 general practices and without previous breast cancer as of January 1, 2006. Women affiliated with a practice referring more women than expected, compared with less, had a lower hazard of breast cancer death (hazard ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.68, 0.95). Negative control associations were near null, suggesting no confounding bias.CONCLUSIONS: This quasi-experimental study estimated a continued protective effect of mammography in women where most were presumably asymptomatic. In contrast to conventional observational studies, the use of practice referral ratio as an instrumental variable may avoid bias from uncontrolled confounding.

KW - Breast neoplasms/mortality

KW - Breast neoplasms/prevention and control

KW - Confounding Factors

KW - Epidemiologic.

KW - Epidemiology/methods

KW - Mammography

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85216945999&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

DO - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 39855264

SN - 1044-3983

JO - Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

JF - Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

M1 - 10.1097/EDE.0000000000001841

ER -

A quasi-experimental study of general practices' referral to mammography in the post-trials treatment era

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this