Abstract
J. D. Trout has recently developed a new defense of scientific realism, a new version of the No Miracles Argument. I critically evaluate Trout's novel defense of realism. I argue that Trout's argument for scientific realism and the related explanation for the success of science are self-defeating. In the process of arguing against the traditional realist strategies for explaining the success of science, he inadvertently undermines his own argument.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A |
Volume | 69 |
Pages (from-to) | 86-89 |
Number of pages | 4 |
ISSN | 0039-3681 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jun 2018 |
Keywords
- No Miracles Argument;
- Scientific realism
- Success of science;