Abstract
We consider the empirical relevance of two opposing hypotheses on the causality between
income and democracy: The Democratic Transition claims that rising incomes cause a transi¬
tion to democracy, whereas the Critical Junctures hypothesis denies this causal relation. Our
empirical strategy is justified by Unified Growth Theory, which hypothe¬sizes that the present
international income differences have roots in the prehistoric past. Thus, we use prehistoric
measures of biogeography as instruments for modern income levels, and find a large long-run
causal effect of income on the degree of democracy. This result rejects the Critical Junctures
hypothesis, which is an important part of the Primacy of Institutions view.
income and democracy: The Democratic Transition claims that rising incomes cause a transi¬
tion to democracy, whereas the Critical Junctures hypothesis denies this causal relation. Our
empirical strategy is justified by Unified Growth Theory, which hypothe¬sizes that the present
international income differences have roots in the prehistoric past. Thus, we use prehistoric
measures of biogeography as instruments for modern income levels, and find a large long-run
causal effect of income on the degree of democracy. This result rejects the Critical Junctures
hypothesis, which is an important part of the Primacy of Institutions view.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Place of publication | Aarhus |
Publisher | Institut for Økonomi, Aarhus Universitet |
Number of pages | 25 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
Keywords
- Long-run growth, democracy, unified growth theory, biogeography