A Critique of the Space-for-Time Substitution Practice in Community Ecology

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperComment/debateResearchpeer-review

The space-for-time substitution assumption is often used implicitly for studying ecological processes in static spatial data sets. Since ecological processes occur in time, this practice is problematic, especially in nonstationary environments. More processes might lead to the same spatial pattern, and instead of testing hypotheses on ecological processes by analyzing spatial variation in static data, it is more judicious to report the observed spatial patterns and only discuss which ecological processes are in concordance with the observed spatial pattern. Alternatively, it might be feasible to combine relatively sparse time-series data or experimental data with spatial variation data and analyze such data types in a common statistical framework.

Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends in Ecology & Evolution
Volume34
Issue5
Pages (from-to)416-421
Number of pages6
ISSN0169-5347
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - May 2019

Bibliographical note

Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • community ecology, interspecific competition, nonstationary environment, space-for-time substitution, successional processes, DISTRIBUTIONS, VARIABILITY, PLANT, DYNAMICS, CHRONOSEQUENCES, PATTERNS

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 150108839