Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
The Democratic Paradox: Are National Elections Always Good for Satisfaction with Democracy in Europe? / Krishnarajan, Suthan.
In: Socio-Economic Review, 2022.Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - The Democratic Paradox:
T2 - Are National Elections Always Good for Satisfaction with Democracy in Europe?
AU - Krishnarajan, Suthan
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This article challenges the widespread notion that national elections are unequivocally good for people's satisfaction with democracy. Instead, it argues that elections have enduring and disparate effects on democratic satisfaction, depending on the economic situation in which they take place; that is the election economy. When held during economic upturns, national elections increase subsequent satisfaction with democracy during most of the following electoral term-regardless of election results and economic growth after the election. When held during economic downturns, elections reduce democratic satisfaction until the next election-again, regardless of such post-election developments. An analysis of 29 European democracies in the period 1973-2019 supports these propositions and suggests that the disparate effects of national elections endure during most of the electoral term. These findings are robust to an array of model specifications, including when accounting for several pre-election and post-election developments.
AB - This article challenges the widespread notion that national elections are unequivocally good for people's satisfaction with democracy. Instead, it argues that elections have enduring and disparate effects on democratic satisfaction, depending on the economic situation in which they take place; that is the election economy. When held during economic upturns, national elections increase subsequent satisfaction with democracy during most of the following electoral term-regardless of election results and economic growth after the election. When held during economic downturns, elections reduce democratic satisfaction until the next election-again, regardless of such post-election developments. An analysis of 29 European democracies in the period 1973-2019 supports these propositions and suggests that the disparate effects of national elections endure during most of the electoral term. These findings are robust to an array of model specifications, including when accounting for several pre-election and post-election developments.
KW - ATTITUDES
KW - DYNAMICS
KW - ECONOMIC-CRISIS
KW - INSTITUTIONS
KW - MECHANISM
KW - PARTICIPATION
KW - POLICY PREFERENCES
KW - POLITICAL EFFICACY
KW - VOTERS
KW - WINNERS
KW - election economy
KW - elections
KW - satisfaction with democracy
U2 - 10.1093/ser/mwac029
DO - 10.1093/ser/mwac029
M3 - Journal article
JO - Socio-Economic Review
JF - Socio-Economic Review
SN - 1475-1461
ER -