Stine Linding Andersen

Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test. / Andersen, Stine Linding; Christensen, Peter Astrup; Knøsgaard, Louise et al.

In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, Vol. 105, No. 11, dgaa567, 11.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Andersen, SL, Christensen, PA, Knøsgaard, L, Andersen, S, Handberg, A, Hansen, AB & Vestergaard, P 2020, 'Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test', The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, vol. 105, no. 11, dgaa567. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

APA

Andersen, S. L., Christensen, P. A., Knøsgaard, L., Andersen, S., Handberg, A., Hansen, A. B., & Vestergaard, P. (2020). Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 105(11), [dgaa567]. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

CBE

Andersen SL, Christensen PA, Knøsgaard L, Andersen S, Handberg A, Hansen AB, Vestergaard P. 2020. Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 105(11):Article dgaa567. https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

MLA

Vancouver

Andersen SL, Christensen PA, Knøsgaard L, Andersen S, Handberg A, Hansen AB et al. Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2020 Nov;105(11):dgaa567. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

Author

Andersen, Stine Linding ; Christensen, Peter Astrup ; Knøsgaard, Louise et al. / Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test. In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2020 ; Vol. 105, No. 11.

Bibtex

@article{bae0cd0bb1864c35a3457753713ba698,
title = "Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Physiological alterations challenge the assessment of maternal thyroid function in pregnancy. It remains uncertain how the reference ranges vary by week of pregnancy, and how the classification of disease varies by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.DESIGN: Serum samples from Danish pregnant women (n = 6282) were used for the measurement of thyrotropin (TSH), total and free thyroxine (T4), total and free 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3), and T-uptake using {"}Method A{"} (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics). TSH and free T4 were also measured using {"}Method B{"} (ADVIA Centaur XP, Siemens Healthineers).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established among thyroid antibody-negative women (n = 4612). The reference ranges were used to classify maternal thyroid function, and results were compared by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.RESULTS: The reference ranges for TSH showed a gradual decrease during pregnancy weeks 4 to 14, a gradual increase was observed for total T4, total T3, and T-uptake, whereas free T4 and free T3 showed less variation. When TSH and free T4 were used, Method A classified 935 (14.9%) with abnormal thyroid function, Method B a total of 903 (14.4%), and the methods agreed on 554 individuals. When TSH and total T4 were used, 947 (15.1%) were classified with abnormal thyroid function, and classifications by either total T4 or free T4 agreed on 584 individuals.CONCLUSIONS: Even when pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established, the classification of maternal thyroid dysfunction varied considerably by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.",
author = "Andersen, {Stine Linding} and Christensen, {Peter Astrup} and Louise Kn{\o}sgaard and Stig Andersen and Aase Handberg and Hansen, {Annebirthe Bo} and Peter Vestergaard",
note = "{\textcopyright} Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2020",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1210/clinem/dgaa567",
language = "English",
volume = "105",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0021-972X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Classification of Thyroid Dysfunction in Pregnant Women Differs by Analytical Method and Type of Thyroid Function Test

AU - Andersen, Stine Linding

AU - Christensen, Peter Astrup

AU - Knøsgaard, Louise

AU - Andersen, Stig

AU - Handberg, Aase

AU - Hansen, Annebirthe Bo

AU - Vestergaard, Peter

N1 - © Endocrine Society 2020. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2020/11

Y1 - 2020/11

N2 - CONTEXT: Physiological alterations challenge the assessment of maternal thyroid function in pregnancy. It remains uncertain how the reference ranges vary by week of pregnancy, and how the classification of disease varies by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.DESIGN: Serum samples from Danish pregnant women (n = 6282) were used for the measurement of thyrotropin (TSH), total and free thyroxine (T4), total and free 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3), and T-uptake using "Method A" (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics). TSH and free T4 were also measured using "Method B" (ADVIA Centaur XP, Siemens Healthineers).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established among thyroid antibody-negative women (n = 4612). The reference ranges were used to classify maternal thyroid function, and results were compared by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.RESULTS: The reference ranges for TSH showed a gradual decrease during pregnancy weeks 4 to 14, a gradual increase was observed for total T4, total T3, and T-uptake, whereas free T4 and free T3 showed less variation. When TSH and free T4 were used, Method A classified 935 (14.9%) with abnormal thyroid function, Method B a total of 903 (14.4%), and the methods agreed on 554 individuals. When TSH and total T4 were used, 947 (15.1%) were classified with abnormal thyroid function, and classifications by either total T4 or free T4 agreed on 584 individuals.CONCLUSIONS: Even when pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established, the classification of maternal thyroid dysfunction varied considerably by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.

AB - CONTEXT: Physiological alterations challenge the assessment of maternal thyroid function in pregnancy. It remains uncertain how the reference ranges vary by week of pregnancy, and how the classification of disease varies by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.DESIGN: Serum samples from Danish pregnant women (n = 6282) were used for the measurement of thyrotropin (TSH), total and free thyroxine (T4), total and free 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3), and T-uptake using "Method A" (Cobas 8000, Roche Diagnostics). TSH and free T4 were also measured using "Method B" (ADVIA Centaur XP, Siemens Healthineers).MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established among thyroid antibody-negative women (n = 4612). The reference ranges were used to classify maternal thyroid function, and results were compared by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.RESULTS: The reference ranges for TSH showed a gradual decrease during pregnancy weeks 4 to 14, a gradual increase was observed for total T4, total T3, and T-uptake, whereas free T4 and free T3 showed less variation. When TSH and free T4 were used, Method A classified 935 (14.9%) with abnormal thyroid function, Method B a total of 903 (14.4%), and the methods agreed on 554 individuals. When TSH and total T4 were used, 947 (15.1%) were classified with abnormal thyroid function, and classifications by either total T4 or free T4 agreed on 584 individuals.CONCLUSIONS: Even when pregnancy week- and method-specific reference ranges were established, the classification of maternal thyroid dysfunction varied considerably by analytical method and type of thyroid function test.

U2 - 10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

DO - 10.1210/clinem/dgaa567

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32835377

VL - 105

JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0021-972X

IS - 11

M1 - dgaa567

ER -