Department of Management

Sonja Perkovic

Random or systematic eye movements: A new measure for information search analysis

Research output: Contribution to conferenceConference abstract for conferenceResearchpeer-review

We propose a new measure for explaining information search and compare it to the Payne index (PI), thus far the most commonly used measure for information search in process-tracing studies. The systematicity index (SI) explains information search in terms of systematicity or the proportion of non-random search, i.e. search that is compensatory (alternative-wise) or noncompensatory (attribute-wise) corrected for chance. The PI, on the other hand, shows the proportion of compensatory and noncompensatory search ignoring random search. We predict that the SI will be higher in environments where information is visually well-organized compared to environments where it is disorganized. We test the SI in a discrete choice experiment with four within-subjects conditions (compensatory, noncompensatory, systematic, and unsystematic visual grouping) using eye-tracking technology. The results show a higher SI in the systematic compared to the unsystematic condition. The PI, however, is close to zero in both conditions. The compensatory and noncompensatory conditions show similar SI but differ on PI. Our experiment shows that the SI is useful for calculating the amount of systematic information search in process-tracing studies and can shed light on processes not captured by the PI.
Original languageEnglish
Publication year2017
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventThe 26th Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making Conference - Industrial Engineering and Management Faculty, Technion, Haifa, Israel
Duration: 21 Aug 201724 Aug 2017


ConferenceThe 26th Subjective Probability, Utility, and Decision Making Conference
LocationIndustrial Engineering and Management Faculty, Technion
Internet address

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 181370826