Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Silvia Ceausu

Incorporating threat in hotspots and coldspots of biodiversity and ecosystem services

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Matthias Schröter, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • ,
  • Roland Kraemer, Helmholtz-Zentrum für Umweltforschung GmbH, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig
  • ,
  • Silvia Ceauşu
  • Graciela M. Rusch, Norwegian Institute for Nature Research

Spatial prioritization could help target conservation actions directed to maintain both biodiversity and ecosystem services. We delineate hotspots and coldspots of two biodiversity conservation features and five regulating and cultural services by incorporating an indicator of ‘threat’, i.e. timber harvest profitability for forest areas in Telemark (Norway). We found hotspots, where high values of biodiversity, ecosystem services and threat coincide, ranging from 0.1 to 7.1% of the area, depending on varying threshold levels. Targeting of these areas for conservation follows reactive conservation approaches. In coldspots, high biodiversity and ecosystem service values coincide with low levels of threat, and cover 0.1–3.4% of the forest area. These areas might serve proactive conservation approaches at lower opportunity cost (foregone timber harvest profits). We conclude that a combination of indicators of biodiversity, ecosystem services and potential threat is an appropriate approach for spatial prioritization of proactive and reactive conservation strategies.

Original languageEnglish
JournalAMBIO
Volume46
Issue7
Pages (from-to)756-768
Number of pages13
ISSN0044-7447
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

    Research areas

  • Carbon sequestration, Carbon storage, Conservation management, Existence value, Recreation, Spatial priority setting

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 144932371