Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals : species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds. / Mikkelsen, Lonnie; Hermannsen, Line; Beedholm, Kristian; Madsen, Peter Teglberg; Tougaard, Jakob.
In: Royal Society Open Science, Vol. 4, No. 7, 170286, 07.2017.Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaper › Journal article › Research › peer-review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Simulated seal scarer sounds scare porpoises, but not seals
T2 - species-specific responses to 12 kHz deterrence sounds
AU - Mikkelsen, Lonnie
AU - Hermannsen, Line
AU - Beedholm, Kristian
AU - Madsen, Peter Teglberg
AU - Tougaard, Jakob
PY - 2017/7
Y1 - 2017/7
N2 - Acoustic harassment devices (AHD) or 'seal scarers' are used extensively, not only to deter seals from fisheries, but also as mitigation tools to deter marine mammals from potentially harmful sound sources, such as offshore pile driving. To test the effectiveness of AHDs, we conducted two studies with similar experimental set-ups on two key species: harbour porpoises and harbour seals. We exposed animals to 500 ms tone bursts at 12 kHz simulating that of an AHD (Lofitech), but with reduced output levels (source peak-to-peak level of 165 dB re 1 mu Pa). Animals were localized with a theodolite before, during and after sound exposures. In total, 12 sound exposures were conducted to porpoises and 13 exposures to seals. Porpoises were found to exhibit avoidance reactions out to ranges of 525m from the sound source. Contrary to this, seal observations increased during sound exposure within 100m of the loudspeaker. We thereby demonstrate that porpoises and seals respond very differently to AHD sounds. This has important implications for application of AHDs in multi-species habitats, as sound levels required to deter less sensitive species (seals) can lead to excessive and unwanted large deterrence ranges on more sensitive species (porpoises).
AB - Acoustic harassment devices (AHD) or 'seal scarers' are used extensively, not only to deter seals from fisheries, but also as mitigation tools to deter marine mammals from potentially harmful sound sources, such as offshore pile driving. To test the effectiveness of AHDs, we conducted two studies with similar experimental set-ups on two key species: harbour porpoises and harbour seals. We exposed animals to 500 ms tone bursts at 12 kHz simulating that of an AHD (Lofitech), but with reduced output levels (source peak-to-peak level of 165 dB re 1 mu Pa). Animals were localized with a theodolite before, during and after sound exposures. In total, 12 sound exposures were conducted to porpoises and 13 exposures to seals. Porpoises were found to exhibit avoidance reactions out to ranges of 525m from the sound source. Contrary to this, seal observations increased during sound exposure within 100m of the loudspeaker. We thereby demonstrate that porpoises and seals respond very differently to AHD sounds. This has important implications for application of AHDs in multi-species habitats, as sound levels required to deter less sensitive species (seals) can lead to excessive and unwanted large deterrence ranges on more sensitive species (porpoises).
KW - acoustic harassment devices
KW - seal scarer
KW - harbour porpoise
KW - harbour seal
KW - mitigation
KW - pile driving
KW - ACOUSTIC HARASSMENT DEVICES
KW - PHOCOENA-PHOCOENA
KW - HARBOR PORPOISES
KW - UNDERWATER DETECTION
KW - PHOCA-VITULINA
KW - TONAL SIGNALS
KW - EXPOSURE
KW - HEARING
KW - PREDICTIONS
KW - THRESHOLDS
U2 - 10.1098/rsos.170286
DO - 10.1098/rsos.170286
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 28791155
VL - 4
JO - Royal Society Open Science
JF - Royal Society Open Science
SN - 2054-5703
IS - 7
M1 - 170286
ER -