Mikael Skou Andersen

Study on assessing the environmental fiscal reform potential for the EU28

Research output: Book/anthology/dissertation/reportReportCommissioned

  • Dominic Hogg, United Kingdom
  • Timothy Elliott, United Kingdom
  • Laurence Elliott, United Kingdom
  • Sarah Ettlinger, United Kingdom
  • Tanzir Chowdhury
  • ,
  • Ayesha Bapasola
  • ,
  • Luke Emery
  • ,
  • Mikael Skou Andersen
  • Patrick ten Brink, Belgium
  • Sirina Withana, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), Belgium
  • J. Schweitzer
  • ,
  • Andreas Illes
  • ,
  • Kamila Paquel
  • ,
  • Konar Mutafoglu
  • ,
  • Jamie Woollard
  • ,
  • Ignasi Ventosa
  • ,
  • Sergio Sastre
  • ,
  • Luis Campos
The 2016 European Semester will soon begin with the adoption of the Annual Growth Survey (AGS) (expected to be in November 2015). The AGS contains priorities which should be addressed in the National Reform Programmes (NRPs) which are due by the end of April 2016. Subsequently, the Commission will propose a series of Country Specific Recommendations (CSRs) accompanied by an analysis in the form of Commission Staff Working Documents (SWDs) for each Member State. The CSRs will be discussed and subsequently adopted following endorsement by the European Council in June/July. It is intended that this study may feed into the development of the CSRs for 2016.
The previous (2015) AGS acknowledged that "employment and growth can be stimulated by shifting the tax burden away from labour towards other types of taxes which are less detrimental to growth, such as recurrent property, environment and consumption taxes”. The AGS set out three pillars that it foresaw as underpinning the EU’s economic and social policy for 2015:
 A coordinated response to boosting investment;
 A renewed commitment to structural reforms; and
 The pursuit of fiscal responsibility.
Environmental taxes (together with consumption and recurrent property taxes) are considered less detrimental to growth than other taxes such as on labour or corporate income and are increasingly promoted in the context of economic recovery and growth-friendly fiscal consolidation. The references to more growth friendly tax systems, and the expressed desire to promote more efficient use of both energy and other resources, point towards a role for environmental fiscal reform (EFR) as a means to set the European economy on a trajectory of growth with a strong shade of green.
Original languageEnglish
Place of publicationBruxelles
VolumeENV D.2/ETU/2015/0005
Number of pages712
Commissioning bodyEuropean Commission
Publication statusPublished - 15 Jan 2016

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats


ID: 96224641