Lene Seibæk

Patient involvement in comprehensive, complex cancer surgery: Perspectives of patients, relatives and health professionals

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

We investigated the perspectives of patients, relatives and health professionals on the drivers and barriers to patient involvement (PI) in the treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). During 2016-2017, individual and focus group interviews were conducted with purposively selected participants during CRS and HIPEC, supplemented by field observations. This material was analysed using meaning condensation (Kvale). Fifteen patients, eight relatives and nine health professionals participated in 31 individual and two focus group interviews, supplemented by 37 observations. The findings were structured into themes concerning treatment decisions, organisation of pathways, knowledge of the patient and life during treatment. Deciding to treat was determined not only by preoperative biomedical information, personal preferences but also findings during surgery. This circumstance put the patients under mental pressure and affected their ability to process the offered information. They furthermore perceived the pathway as complex and occasionally unclear, leading them to attempt to coordinate transitions themselves. The study has highlighted barriers to, rather than drivers of, PI. To promote PI during comprehensive complex cancer surgery, we suggest that patients and relatives are offered patient-centred care, such as support in posing questions, overview of their treatment pathway and coherent transitions.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere13071
JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer Care
Volume28
Issue4
Number of pages10
ISSN0961-5423
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2019

    Research areas

  • cancer care, patient involvement, patient pathway, treatment decision

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 152234659