Aarhus University Seal

Laurits Emil Taul Madsen

Exercise booster sessions as a mean to maintain the effect of an exercise-intervention - A systematic review

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

Exercise booster sessions as a mean to maintain the effect of an exercise-intervention - A systematic review. / Taul-Madsen, Laurits; Kjeldsen, Troels; Skou, Søren T. et al.
In: Physical Therapy Reviews, Vol. 27, No. 2, 2022, p. 103-113.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Taul-Madsen L, Kjeldsen T, Skou ST, Mechlenburg I, Dalgas U. Exercise booster sessions as a mean to maintain the effect of an exercise-intervention - A systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews. 2022;27(2):103-113. Epub 2021 Oct 2. doi: 10.1080/10833196.2021.1988816

Author

Bibtex

@article{2012f20a2ab644c7a67bc4353cb59627,
title = "Exercise booster sessions as a mean to maintain the effect of an exercise-intervention - A systematic review",
abstract = "Background:Exercise is known to have many beneficial effects. Nevertheless, long-term adherence remains a challenge. A concept suggested to attend this problem is Exercise Booster Sessions (EBS). However, the current knowledge on EBS is limited. Objectives:This systematic review aimed to summarize and synthesize 1) the reported effects of EBS on physical function, pain, quality-of-life and societal costs and 2) delineate the basic components of EBS (frequency, intensity, type and time) following an exercise intervention in all clinical populations. Methods Seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDISCUS, Physiotherapy Evidence Database PEDro, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were electronically searched in August 2021. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions in all clinical populations followed by a period of EBS or a control group not receiving EBS. Results: Five studies on respectively knee osteoarthritis (n = 4) and low back pain (n = 1), reporting four different RCTs, were included. Four studies had a potential high risk of bias, whereas one was rated to have some concerns. One study found a positive effect of EBS on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, −46.0 (-80.0, −12.0), whereas the others did not find any differences. The frequency of EBS ranged from 0.09 − 1 session/week, and one study found EBS to be cost-effective. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests no or at best moderate effects of EBS on physical function and pain. However, the low number of trials, the potential risk of bias, plus the diversity in trial interventions prevent a firm conclusion.",
keywords = "pain, physical function, Rehabilitation",
author = "Laurits Taul-Madsen and Troels Kjeldsen and Skou, {S{\o}ren T.} and Inger Mechlenburg and Ulrik Dalgas",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1080/10833196.2021.1988816",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "103--113",
journal = "Physical Therapy Reviews",
issn = "1083-3196",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis ",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Exercise booster sessions as a mean to maintain the effect of an exercise-intervention - A systematic review

AU - Taul-Madsen, Laurits

AU - Kjeldsen, Troels

AU - Skou, Søren T.

AU - Mechlenburg, Inger

AU - Dalgas, Ulrik

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background:Exercise is known to have many beneficial effects. Nevertheless, long-term adherence remains a challenge. A concept suggested to attend this problem is Exercise Booster Sessions (EBS). However, the current knowledge on EBS is limited. Objectives:This systematic review aimed to summarize and synthesize 1) the reported effects of EBS on physical function, pain, quality-of-life and societal costs and 2) delineate the basic components of EBS (frequency, intensity, type and time) following an exercise intervention in all clinical populations. Methods Seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDISCUS, Physiotherapy Evidence Database PEDro, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were electronically searched in August 2021. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions in all clinical populations followed by a period of EBS or a control group not receiving EBS. Results: Five studies on respectively knee osteoarthritis (n = 4) and low back pain (n = 1), reporting four different RCTs, were included. Four studies had a potential high risk of bias, whereas one was rated to have some concerns. One study found a positive effect of EBS on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, −46.0 (-80.0, −12.0), whereas the others did not find any differences. The frequency of EBS ranged from 0.09 − 1 session/week, and one study found EBS to be cost-effective. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests no or at best moderate effects of EBS on physical function and pain. However, the low number of trials, the potential risk of bias, plus the diversity in trial interventions prevent a firm conclusion.

AB - Background:Exercise is known to have many beneficial effects. Nevertheless, long-term adherence remains a challenge. A concept suggested to attend this problem is Exercise Booster Sessions (EBS). However, the current knowledge on EBS is limited. Objectives:This systematic review aimed to summarize and synthesize 1) the reported effects of EBS on physical function, pain, quality-of-life and societal costs and 2) delineate the basic components of EBS (frequency, intensity, type and time) following an exercise intervention in all clinical populations. Methods Seven databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SportDISCUS, Physiotherapy Evidence Database PEDro, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were electronically searched in August 2021. Included studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise interventions in all clinical populations followed by a period of EBS or a control group not receiving EBS. Results: Five studies on respectively knee osteoarthritis (n = 4) and low back pain (n = 1), reporting four different RCTs, were included. Four studies had a potential high risk of bias, whereas one was rated to have some concerns. One study found a positive effect of EBS on the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score, −46.0 (-80.0, −12.0), whereas the others did not find any differences. The frequency of EBS ranged from 0.09 − 1 session/week, and one study found EBS to be cost-effective. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests no or at best moderate effects of EBS on physical function and pain. However, the low number of trials, the potential risk of bias, plus the diversity in trial interventions prevent a firm conclusion.

KW - pain

KW - physical function

KW - Rehabilitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85117504530&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10833196.2021.1988816

DO - 10.1080/10833196.2021.1988816

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:85117504530

VL - 27

SP - 103

EP - 113

JO - Physical Therapy Reviews

JF - Physical Therapy Reviews

SN - 1083-3196

IS - 2

ER -