Kristian Dahl Friesgaard

Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols. / Friesgaard, Kristian D; Kirkegaard, Hans; Rasmussen, Claus-Henrik; Giebner, Matthias; Christensen, Erika F; Nikolajsen, Lone.

In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 1, 11, 07.02.2019, p. 11.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Friesgaard, Kristian D ; Kirkegaard, Hans ; Rasmussen, Claus-Henrik ; Giebner, Matthias ; Christensen, Erika F ; Nikolajsen, Lone. / Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols. In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine. 2019 ; Vol. 27, No. 1. pp. 11.

Bibtex

@article{f146b0a8fe98412fba9028a1c55d43ff,
title = "Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: Prehospital acute pain is a frequent symptom that is often inadequately managed. The concerns of opioid induced side effects are well-founded. To ensure patient safety, ambulance personnel are therefore provided with treatment protocols with dosing restrictions, however, with the concomitant risk of insufficient pain treatment of the patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a liberal intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol on efficacy and safety measures.METHODS: A two-armed, cluster-randomised trial was conducted in the Central Denmark Region over a 1-year period. Ambulance stations (stratified according to size) were randomised to follow either a liberal treatment protocol (3 μg/kg) or a standard treatment protocol (2 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sufficient pan relief (numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) < 3) at hospital arrival. Secondary outcomes included abnormal vital parameters as proxy measures of safety. A multi-level mixed effect logistic regression model was applied.RESULTS: In total, 5278 patients were included. Ambulance personnel following the liberal protocol administered higher doses of fentanyl [117.7 μg (95% CI 116.7-118.6)] than ambulance personnel following the standard protocol [111.5 μg (95% CI 110.7-112.4), P = 0.0001]. The number of patient with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival was higher in the liberal treatment group than the standard treatment group [44.0% (95% CI 41.8-46.1) vs. 37.4% (95% CI 35.2-39.6), adjusted odds ratio 1.47 (95% CI 1.17-1.84)]. The relative decrease in NRS scores during transport was less evident [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.48)]. The occurrences of abnormal vital parameters were similar in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Liberalising an intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol applied by ambulance personnel slightly increased the number of patients with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival without compromising patient safety. Future efforts of training ambulance personnel are needed to further improve protocol adherence and quality of treatment.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02914678 ). Date of registration: 26th September, 2016.",
keywords = "Acute pain, Ambulance personnel, Intravenous fentanyl, Prehospital",
author = "Friesgaard, {Kristian D} and Hans Kirkegaard and Claus-Henrik Rasmussen and Matthias Giebner and Christensen, {Erika F} and Lone Nikolajsen",
year = "2019",
month = feb,
day = "7",
doi = "10.1186/s13049-019-0588-4",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "11",
journal = "Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine",
issn = "1757-7241",
publisher = "BioMed Central",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Prehospital intravenous fentanyl administered by ambulance personnel: a cluster-randomised comparison of two treatment protocols

AU - Friesgaard, Kristian D

AU - Kirkegaard, Hans

AU - Rasmussen, Claus-Henrik

AU - Giebner, Matthias

AU - Christensen, Erika F

AU - Nikolajsen, Lone

PY - 2019/2/7

Y1 - 2019/2/7

N2 - BACKGROUND: Prehospital acute pain is a frequent symptom that is often inadequately managed. The concerns of opioid induced side effects are well-founded. To ensure patient safety, ambulance personnel are therefore provided with treatment protocols with dosing restrictions, however, with the concomitant risk of insufficient pain treatment of the patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a liberal intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol on efficacy and safety measures.METHODS: A two-armed, cluster-randomised trial was conducted in the Central Denmark Region over a 1-year period. Ambulance stations (stratified according to size) were randomised to follow either a liberal treatment protocol (3 μg/kg) or a standard treatment protocol (2 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sufficient pan relief (numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) < 3) at hospital arrival. Secondary outcomes included abnormal vital parameters as proxy measures of safety. A multi-level mixed effect logistic regression model was applied.RESULTS: In total, 5278 patients were included. Ambulance personnel following the liberal protocol administered higher doses of fentanyl [117.7 μg (95% CI 116.7-118.6)] than ambulance personnel following the standard protocol [111.5 μg (95% CI 110.7-112.4), P = 0.0001]. The number of patient with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival was higher in the liberal treatment group than the standard treatment group [44.0% (95% CI 41.8-46.1) vs. 37.4% (95% CI 35.2-39.6), adjusted odds ratio 1.47 (95% CI 1.17-1.84)]. The relative decrease in NRS scores during transport was less evident [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.48)]. The occurrences of abnormal vital parameters were similar in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Liberalising an intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol applied by ambulance personnel slightly increased the number of patients with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival without compromising patient safety. Future efforts of training ambulance personnel are needed to further improve protocol adherence and quality of treatment.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02914678 ). Date of registration: 26th September, 2016.

AB - BACKGROUND: Prehospital acute pain is a frequent symptom that is often inadequately managed. The concerns of opioid induced side effects are well-founded. To ensure patient safety, ambulance personnel are therefore provided with treatment protocols with dosing restrictions, however, with the concomitant risk of insufficient pain treatment of the patients. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of a liberal intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol on efficacy and safety measures.METHODS: A two-armed, cluster-randomised trial was conducted in the Central Denmark Region over a 1-year period. Ambulance stations (stratified according to size) were randomised to follow either a liberal treatment protocol (3 μg/kg) or a standard treatment protocol (2 μg/kg). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with sufficient pan relief (numeric rating scale (NRS, 0-10) < 3) at hospital arrival. Secondary outcomes included abnormal vital parameters as proxy measures of safety. A multi-level mixed effect logistic regression model was applied.RESULTS: In total, 5278 patients were included. Ambulance personnel following the liberal protocol administered higher doses of fentanyl [117.7 μg (95% CI 116.7-118.6)] than ambulance personnel following the standard protocol [111.5 μg (95% CI 110.7-112.4), P = 0.0001]. The number of patient with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival was higher in the liberal treatment group than the standard treatment group [44.0% (95% CI 41.8-46.1) vs. 37.4% (95% CI 35.2-39.6), adjusted odds ratio 1.47 (95% CI 1.17-1.84)]. The relative decrease in NRS scores during transport was less evident [adjusted odds ratio 1.18 (95% CI 0.95-1.48)]. The occurrences of abnormal vital parameters were similar in both groups.CONCLUSIONS: Liberalising an intravenous fentanyl treatment protocol applied by ambulance personnel slightly increased the number of patients with sufficient pain relief at hospital arrival without compromising patient safety. Future efforts of training ambulance personnel are needed to further improve protocol adherence and quality of treatment.TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02914678 ). Date of registration: 26th September, 2016.

KW - Acute pain

KW - Ambulance personnel

KW - Intravenous fentanyl

KW - Prehospital

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061193521&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1186/s13049-019-0588-4

DO - 10.1186/s13049-019-0588-4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30732618

VL - 27

SP - 11

JO - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

JF - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine

SN - 1757-7241

IS - 1

M1 - 11

ER -