The Danish Centre for Studies in Research and Research Policy

Jesper Wiborg Schneider

Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas. / Degn, Lise; Mejlgaard, Niels; Schneider, Jesper Wiborg.

In: Research Evaluation, Vol. 28, No. 4, 10.2019, p. 394-404.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Degn L, Mejlgaard N, Schneider JW. Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas. Research Evaluation. 2019 Oct;28(4):394-404. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvz025

Author

Bibtex

@article{3f021dde8cdb4a51949e3cd4dacbad34,
title = "Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas",
abstract = "The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for science mapping, which remedies some of the classic limitations to e.g. using co-citation analysis as a mapping tool. With the emergence of new, more complex and interdisciplinary areas of research it becomes important to adjust our understandings of how to study these areas, and the argument of the present paper is that in order to provide high-resolution maps of emerging scientific areas, we need to start in the 'cognitive colleges' of the research areas themselves. To do so, a mixed methods design with co-nomination as its backbone is proposed. The potential and limitations of the alternative approach to science mapping are discussed based on an empirical example of mapping an vaguely defined research area in Denmark.",
keywords = "CO-NOMINATION, MAPPING SCIENTIFIC FIELDS, co-nomination, complex research areas, mixed methods, science mapping",
author = "Lise Degn and Niels Mejlgaard and Schneider, {Jesper Wiborg}",
year = "2019",
month = oct,
doi = "10.1093/reseval/rvz025",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "394--404",
journal = "Research Evaluation",
issn = "0958-2029",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Using mixed methods to map vaguely defined research areas

AU - Degn, Lise

AU - Mejlgaard, Niels

AU - Schneider, Jesper Wiborg

PY - 2019/10

Y1 - 2019/10

N2 - The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for science mapping, which remedies some of the classic limitations to e.g. using co-citation analysis as a mapping tool. With the emergence of new, more complex and interdisciplinary areas of research it becomes important to adjust our understandings of how to study these areas, and the argument of the present paper is that in order to provide high-resolution maps of emerging scientific areas, we need to start in the 'cognitive colleges' of the research areas themselves. To do so, a mixed methods design with co-nomination as its backbone is proposed. The potential and limitations of the alternative approach to science mapping are discussed based on an empirical example of mapping an vaguely defined research area in Denmark.

AB - The aim of this article is to present an alternative method for science mapping, which remedies some of the classic limitations to e.g. using co-citation analysis as a mapping tool. With the emergence of new, more complex and interdisciplinary areas of research it becomes important to adjust our understandings of how to study these areas, and the argument of the present paper is that in order to provide high-resolution maps of emerging scientific areas, we need to start in the 'cognitive colleges' of the research areas themselves. To do so, a mixed methods design with co-nomination as its backbone is proposed. The potential and limitations of the alternative approach to science mapping are discussed based on an empirical example of mapping an vaguely defined research area in Denmark.

KW - CO-NOMINATION

KW - MAPPING SCIENTIFIC FIELDS

KW - co-nomination

KW - complex research areas

KW - mixed methods

KW - science mapping

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvz025

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvz025

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 394

EP - 404

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

SN - 0958-2029

IS - 4

ER -