Jens Grønbech Hansen

IPM strategies and their dilemmas including an introduction to www.Eurowheat.org

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Lise Nistrup Jørgensen
  • Mogens Støvring Hovmøller
  • Jens Grønbech Hansen
  • Poul Lassen
  • Bill Clark, NIAB/TAG, United Kingdom
  • Rosemary Bayles, NIAB/TAG, United Kingdom
  • Bernd Rodemann, Julius Kuehn Institute, Germany
  • Kerstin Flath, Julius Kuehn Institute, Germany
  • Margot Jahn, Julius Kuehn Institute, Germany
  • Tomas Goral, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, IHA-PIB Radzikow, Poland
  • Jerzy Czembor, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute, IHA-PIB Radzikow, Poland
  • Philip Cheyron, Arvalis du Vegetal, France
  • Claude Maumene, Arvalis du Vegetal, France
  • Claude De Pope, Institut national de la recherche agronomique (INRA), France
  • Rita Ban, Szent István University, Hungary
  • Ghita Cordsen Nielsen, Knowledge Centre for Agriculture, Denmark
  • Gunilla Berg, Swedish Board of Agriculture, Plant Protection Centre, Sweden
Information about disease management in winter wheat (Triticum aestiva) in eight European countries was collated and analysed by scientists and extension workers within a European Network for Durable Exploitation (ENDURE). This included information about specific disease thresholds, decision support systems, host varieties, disease prevalence and pathogen virulence. Major differences in disease prevalence and economic importance were observed. Septoria tritici blotch (Mycosphaerella graminicola) was recognized as the most yield reducing disease in countries with intensive wheat production, but also rust diseases (Puccinia striiformis and Puccinia triticina), powdery mildew (Blumeria graminis) and Fusarium head blight (Fusarium spp.) were seen as serious disease problems. Examples of current IPM strategies in different countries have been reported. Disease management and fungicide use patterns showed major differences, with an average input equivalent to 2.3 full dose rates (TFI) in the UK and a TFI of 0.6 in Denmark. These differences are most likely due to a combination of different cropping systems, climatic differences, disease prevalence and socio-economic factors. The web based information platformwww.EuroWheat.org was used for dissemination of information and results including information on control thresholds, cultural practices which can influence disease attack, fungicide efficacy, fungicide resistance and pathogen virulence, which are all elements supporting IPM for disease control in wheat. The platform is open to all users. The target groups of EuroWheat information are researchers, advisors, breeders and similar partners dealing with disease management in wheat.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Integrative Agriculture
Volume13
Issue2
Pages (from-to)265-281
Number of pages17
ISSN2095-3119
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2014

    Research areas

  • winter wheat, IPM, fungicides, diseases, cultural methods

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 51497322