Aarhus University Seal

Iben Lyskjær Heimann

DNA methylation-based profiling of bone and soft tissue tumours: a validation study of the ‘DKFZ Sarcoma Classifier’

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

  • Iben Lyskjær
  • Solange De Noon, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Roberto Tirabosco, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Ana Maia Rocha, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Daniel Lindsay, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Fernanda Amary, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Hongtao Ye, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust
  • ,
  • Daniel Schrimpf, Heidelberg University , German Cancer Research Center
  • ,
  • Damian Stichel, German Cancer Research Center
  • ,
  • Martin Sill, Hopp Children’s Cancer Center Heidelberg (KiTZ), German Cancer Research Center
  • ,
  • Christian Koelsche, Heidelberg University , German Cancer Research Center
  • ,
  • Nischalan Pillay, University College London
  • ,
  • Andreas Von Deimling, Heidelberg University , German Cancer Research Center
  • ,
  • Stephan Beck, University College London
  • ,
  • Adrienne M. Flanagan, University College London, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust

Diagnosing bone and soft tissue neoplasms remains challenging because of the large number of subtypes, many of which lack diagnostic biomarkers. DNA methylation profiles have proven to be a reliable basis for the classification of brain tumours and, following this success, a DNA methylation-based sarcoma classification tool from the Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ) in Heidelberg has been developed. In this study, we assessed the performance of their classifier on DNA methylation profiles of an independent data set of 986 bone and soft tissue tumours and controls. We found that the ‘DKFZ Sarcoma Classifier’ was able to produce a diagnostic prediction for 55% of the 986 samples, with 83% of these predictions concordant with the histological diagnosis. On limiting the validation to the 820 cases with histological diagnoses for which the DKFZ Classifier was trained, 61% of cases received a prediction, and the histological diagnosis was concordant with the predicted methylation class in 88% of these cases, findings comparable to those reported in the DKFZ Classifier paper. The classifier performed best when diagnosing mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (CHSs, 88% sensitivity), chordomas (85% sensitivity), and fibrous dysplasia (83% sensitivity). Amongst the subtypes least often classified correctly were clear cell CHSs (14% sensitivity), malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumours (27% sensitivity), and pleomorphic liposarcomas (29% sensitivity). The classifier predictions resulted in revision of the histological diagnosis in six of our cases. We observed that, although a higher tumour purity resulted in a greater likelihood of a prediction being made, it did not correlate with classifier accuracy. Our results show that the DKFZ Classifier represents a powerful research tool for exploring the pathogenesis of sarcoma; with refinement, it has the potential to be a valuable diagnostic tool.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Pathology: Clinical Research
Volume7
Issue4
Pages (from-to)350-360
Number of pages11
ISSN2056-4538
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research published by The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland & John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

    Research areas

  • bone, classifier, methylation profiling, sarcoma, soft tissue

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 216877094