Hanne Bess Boelsbjerg

Nurses’ refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Nurses’ refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care. / Glasdam, Stinne; Jacobsen, Charlotte Bredahl; Boelsbjerg, Hanne Bess.

In: Nursing Ethics, Vol. 27, No. 8, 12.2020, p. 1618-1630.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Glasdam S, Jacobsen CB, Boelsbjerg HB. Nurses’ refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care. Nursing Ethics. 2020 Dec;27(8):1618-1630. doi: 10.1177/0969733020929062

Author

Glasdam, Stinne ; Jacobsen, Charlotte Bredahl ; Boelsbjerg, Hanne Bess. / Nurses’ refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care. In: Nursing Ethics. 2020 ; Vol. 27, No. 8. pp. 1618-1630.

Bibtex

@article{2965aa58af254d3782aa0af11396a699,
title = "Nurses{\textquoteright} refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care",
abstract = "Background: Ideas of patient involvement are related to notions of self-determination and autonomy, which are not always in alignment with complex interactions and communication in clinical practice. Aim: To illuminate and discuss patient involvement in routine clinical care situations in nursing practice from an ethical perspective. Method: A case study based on an anthropological field study among patients with advanced cancer in Denmark. Ethical considerations: Followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Findings: Two cases illustrated situations where nurses refused patient involvement in their own case. Discussion: Focus on two ethical issues, namely {\textquoteleft}including patients{\textquoteright} experiences in palliative nursing care{\textquoteright} and {\textquoteleft}relational distribution of power and knowledge{\textquoteright}, inspired primarily by Hannah Arendt{\textquoteright}s concept of thoughtlessness and a Foucauldian perspective on the medical clinic and power. The article discusses how patients{\textquoteright} palliative care needs and preferences, knowledge and statements become part of the less significant background of nursing practice, when nurses have a predefined agenda for acting with and involvement of patients. Both structurally conditioned {\textquoteleft}thoughtlessness{\textquoteright} of the nurses and distribution of power and knowledge between patients and nurses condition nurses to set the agenda and assess when and at what level it is relevant to take up patients{\textquoteright} invitations to involve them in their own case. Conclusion: The medical and institutional logic of the healthcare service sets the framework for the exchange between professional and patient, which has an embedded risk that {\textquoteleft}thoughtlessness{\textquoteright} appears among nurses. The consequences of neglecting the spontaneous nature of human action and refusing the invitations of the patients to be involved in their life situation call for ethical and practical reflection among nurses. The conditions for interaction with humans as unpredictable and variable challenge nurses{\textquoteright} ways of being ethically attentive to ensure that patients receive good palliative care, despite the structurally conditioned logic of healthcare.",
keywords = "nurse refusals, palliative care, Patient involvement, power, thoughtlessness",
author = "Stinne Glasdam and Jacobsen, {Charlotte Bredahl} and Boelsbjerg, {Hanne Bess}",
year = "2020",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1177/0969733020929062",
language = "English",
volume = "27",
pages = "1618--1630",
journal = "Nursing Ethics",
issn = "0969-7330",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Ltd",
number = "8",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nurses’ refusals of patient involvement in their own palliative care

AU - Glasdam, Stinne

AU - Jacobsen, Charlotte Bredahl

AU - Boelsbjerg, Hanne Bess

PY - 2020/12

Y1 - 2020/12

N2 - Background: Ideas of patient involvement are related to notions of self-determination and autonomy, which are not always in alignment with complex interactions and communication in clinical practice. Aim: To illuminate and discuss patient involvement in routine clinical care situations in nursing practice from an ethical perspective. Method: A case study based on an anthropological field study among patients with advanced cancer in Denmark. Ethical considerations: Followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Findings: Two cases illustrated situations where nurses refused patient involvement in their own case. Discussion: Focus on two ethical issues, namely ‘including patients’ experiences in palliative nursing care’ and ‘relational distribution of power and knowledge’, inspired primarily by Hannah Arendt’s concept of thoughtlessness and a Foucauldian perspective on the medical clinic and power. The article discusses how patients’ palliative care needs and preferences, knowledge and statements become part of the less significant background of nursing practice, when nurses have a predefined agenda for acting with and involvement of patients. Both structurally conditioned ‘thoughtlessness’ of the nurses and distribution of power and knowledge between patients and nurses condition nurses to set the agenda and assess when and at what level it is relevant to take up patients’ invitations to involve them in their own case. Conclusion: The medical and institutional logic of the healthcare service sets the framework for the exchange between professional and patient, which has an embedded risk that ‘thoughtlessness’ appears among nurses. The consequences of neglecting the spontaneous nature of human action and refusing the invitations of the patients to be involved in their life situation call for ethical and practical reflection among nurses. The conditions for interaction with humans as unpredictable and variable challenge nurses’ ways of being ethically attentive to ensure that patients receive good palliative care, despite the structurally conditioned logic of healthcare.

AB - Background: Ideas of patient involvement are related to notions of self-determination and autonomy, which are not always in alignment with complex interactions and communication in clinical practice. Aim: To illuminate and discuss patient involvement in routine clinical care situations in nursing practice from an ethical perspective. Method: A case study based on an anthropological field study among patients with advanced cancer in Denmark. Ethical considerations: Followed the principles of the Helsinki Declaration. Findings: Two cases illustrated situations where nurses refused patient involvement in their own case. Discussion: Focus on two ethical issues, namely ‘including patients’ experiences in palliative nursing care’ and ‘relational distribution of power and knowledge’, inspired primarily by Hannah Arendt’s concept of thoughtlessness and a Foucauldian perspective on the medical clinic and power. The article discusses how patients’ palliative care needs and preferences, knowledge and statements become part of the less significant background of nursing practice, when nurses have a predefined agenda for acting with and involvement of patients. Both structurally conditioned ‘thoughtlessness’ of the nurses and distribution of power and knowledge between patients and nurses condition nurses to set the agenda and assess when and at what level it is relevant to take up patients’ invitations to involve them in their own case. Conclusion: The medical and institutional logic of the healthcare service sets the framework for the exchange between professional and patient, which has an embedded risk that ‘thoughtlessness’ appears among nurses. The consequences of neglecting the spontaneous nature of human action and refusing the invitations of the patients to be involved in their life situation call for ethical and practical reflection among nurses. The conditions for interaction with humans as unpredictable and variable challenge nurses’ ways of being ethically attentive to ensure that patients receive good palliative care, despite the structurally conditioned logic of healthcare.

KW - nurse refusals

KW - palliative care

KW - Patient involvement

KW - power

KW - thoughtlessness

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85087564495&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0969733020929062

DO - 10.1177/0969733020929062

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32627661

AN - SCOPUS:85087564495

VL - 27

SP - 1618

EP - 1630

JO - Nursing Ethics

JF - Nursing Ethics

SN - 0969-7330

IS - 8

ER -