Aarhus University Seal

Esben Auken

Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method. / Xiao, Longying; Gianluca, Fiandaca; Bo, Zhang et al.
In: Geophysics, Vol. 87, No. 4, 07.2022, p. E267-E277.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Xiao L, Gianluca F, Bo Z, Auken E, Christiansen AV. Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method. Geophysics. 2022 Jul;87(4):E267-E277. Epub 2022 May 4. doi: 10.1190/geo2021-0402.1

Author

Xiao, Longying ; Gianluca, Fiandaca ; Bo, Zhang et al. / Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method. In: Geophysics. 2022 ; Vol. 87, No. 4. pp. E267-E277.

Bibtex

@article{07de4eb157544c4283b03de5ffa271af,
title = "Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method",
abstract = "Two efficient implementations of 3D and 2.5D modeling and inversion are presented to be applicable to large-scale transient electromagnetic (TEM) method explorations. The key novel features are (1) forward response and Jacobian calculations are implemented using the octree-based finite-element method, (2) a mirror approach is used to build a 2.5D inversion scheme for further efficiency, and (3) a flexible link between the forward mesh and inversion model is applied on 3D and 2.5D schemes based on the voxel formulation. We compare the performance of the new implementations with 3D modeling using tetrahedral meshes, with respect to speed and memory requirements. The 3D octree algorithm requires less than 1/3 of the computational time compared with a 3D tetrahedral scheme for equivalent ac-curacy. The 2.5D octree algorithm further speeds up the process by reducing the computational time by another factor of two. The inversion uses the Levenberg-Marquart approach minimiz-ing the least-squares criterion of the objective function. We determine the utility of our inversion approach on a synthetic example and a field example. In the synthetic example, the 3D octree inversion result finds superior resolution of a 3D anomaly compared with a 1D result, whereas the 2.5D inversion result is, expectedly, between the 1D and 3D results, but with favorable computational expenses compared with the full 3D solution. The field data set contains 200 soundings, and we per-form a 3D inversion on the full survey. A 24-sounding section is then selected for the 2.5D inversion. The 2.5D inversion result finds resistivity features similar to the 3D inversion result at the selected profile. Hence, we conclude that the presented imple-mentations are capable of handling relatively large TEM surveys on modern computational platforms. This could be smaller sub-sets of production-size surveys where 2D and 3D effects are pro-nounced.",
keywords = "3D, electromagnetics, Finite element, inversion, time-domain, SYSTEM, MESH, RESISTIVITY, SIMULATION, MAXWELLS EQUATIONS, 3-DIMENSIONAL INVERSION, TTEM",
author = "Longying Xiao and Fiandaca Gianluca and Zhang Bo and Esben Auken and Christiansen, {Anders Vest}",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1190/geo2021-0402.1",
language = "English",
volume = "87",
pages = "E267--E277",
journal = "Geophysics",
issn = "0016-8033",
publisher = "Society of Exploration Geophysicists",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Fast 2.5D and 3D Inversion of transient electromagnetic surveys using the octree-based finite element method

AU - Xiao, Longying

AU - Gianluca, Fiandaca

AU - Bo, Zhang

AU - Auken, Esben

AU - Christiansen, Anders Vest

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - Two efficient implementations of 3D and 2.5D modeling and inversion are presented to be applicable to large-scale transient electromagnetic (TEM) method explorations. The key novel features are (1) forward response and Jacobian calculations are implemented using the octree-based finite-element method, (2) a mirror approach is used to build a 2.5D inversion scheme for further efficiency, and (3) a flexible link between the forward mesh and inversion model is applied on 3D and 2.5D schemes based on the voxel formulation. We compare the performance of the new implementations with 3D modeling using tetrahedral meshes, with respect to speed and memory requirements. The 3D octree algorithm requires less than 1/3 of the computational time compared with a 3D tetrahedral scheme for equivalent ac-curacy. The 2.5D octree algorithm further speeds up the process by reducing the computational time by another factor of two. The inversion uses the Levenberg-Marquart approach minimiz-ing the least-squares criterion of the objective function. We determine the utility of our inversion approach on a synthetic example and a field example. In the synthetic example, the 3D octree inversion result finds superior resolution of a 3D anomaly compared with a 1D result, whereas the 2.5D inversion result is, expectedly, between the 1D and 3D results, but with favorable computational expenses compared with the full 3D solution. The field data set contains 200 soundings, and we per-form a 3D inversion on the full survey. A 24-sounding section is then selected for the 2.5D inversion. The 2.5D inversion result finds resistivity features similar to the 3D inversion result at the selected profile. Hence, we conclude that the presented imple-mentations are capable of handling relatively large TEM surveys on modern computational platforms. This could be smaller sub-sets of production-size surveys where 2D and 3D effects are pro-nounced.

AB - Two efficient implementations of 3D and 2.5D modeling and inversion are presented to be applicable to large-scale transient electromagnetic (TEM) method explorations. The key novel features are (1) forward response and Jacobian calculations are implemented using the octree-based finite-element method, (2) a mirror approach is used to build a 2.5D inversion scheme for further efficiency, and (3) a flexible link between the forward mesh and inversion model is applied on 3D and 2.5D schemes based on the voxel formulation. We compare the performance of the new implementations with 3D modeling using tetrahedral meshes, with respect to speed and memory requirements. The 3D octree algorithm requires less than 1/3 of the computational time compared with a 3D tetrahedral scheme for equivalent ac-curacy. The 2.5D octree algorithm further speeds up the process by reducing the computational time by another factor of two. The inversion uses the Levenberg-Marquart approach minimiz-ing the least-squares criterion of the objective function. We determine the utility of our inversion approach on a synthetic example and a field example. In the synthetic example, the 3D octree inversion result finds superior resolution of a 3D anomaly compared with a 1D result, whereas the 2.5D inversion result is, expectedly, between the 1D and 3D results, but with favorable computational expenses compared with the full 3D solution. The field data set contains 200 soundings, and we per-form a 3D inversion on the full survey. A 24-sounding section is then selected for the 2.5D inversion. The 2.5D inversion result finds resistivity features similar to the 3D inversion result at the selected profile. Hence, we conclude that the presented imple-mentations are capable of handling relatively large TEM surveys on modern computational platforms. This could be smaller sub-sets of production-size surveys where 2D and 3D effects are pro-nounced.

KW - 3D

KW - electromagnetics

KW - Finite element

KW - inversion

KW - time-domain

KW - SYSTEM

KW - MESH

KW - RESISTIVITY

KW - SIMULATION

KW - MAXWELLS EQUATIONS

KW - 3-DIMENSIONAL INVERSION

KW - TTEM

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130484713&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1190/geo2021-0402.1

DO - 10.1190/geo2021-0402.1

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85130484713

VL - 87

SP - E267-E277

JO - Geophysics

JF - Geophysics

SN - 0016-8033

IS - 4

ER -