Department of Political Science

Daniel Finke

Reputation and Organizational Politics: Inside the EU Commission

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

DOI

This article uses reputation theory to address a century-old puzzle: what guides the choice of coordination efforts in large politico-administrative systems? Max Weber, founder of the modern study of bureaucracy, famously considered a hierarchy superior to other organizational models. However, modern governments are not organized as one big hierarchy but as a set of parallel hierarchies, typically 15–20 ministries. This raises a coordination challenge, which in practice has proven surprisingly difficult to meet. Based on reputation theory, we argue that concerns of audience management are likely to be an important factor when deciding on the level of coordination. We investigate this argument in the European Union’s central executive institution, the EU Commission. Based on more than 7,000 cases from the EU Commission’s internal digital coordination system we analyze the impact of audience sensitivity and audience involvement on coordination efforts. Our findings suggest that audience concerns are important drivers of agencies’ interdepartmental coordination.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Politics
Volume82
Issue1
Pages (from-to)135-148
Number of pages14
ISSN0022-3816
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2020

    Research areas

  • COORDINATION, COUNCIL, DECISION-MAKING SPEED, EUROPEAN-UNION, MEDIA, MODELS, POLICY, SALIENCE

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 131240637