Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Asbjørn Steglich-Petersen

No norm needed: on the aim of belief

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Department of Philosophy
Does transparency in doxastic deliberation entail a constitutive norm of correctness governing belief, as Shah and Velleman argue? No, because this presupposes an implausibly strong relation between normative judgements and motivation from such judgements, ignores our interest in truth, and cannot explain why we pay different attention to how much justification we have for our beliefs in different contexts. An alternative account of transparency is available: transparency can be explained by the aim one necessarily adopts in deliberating about whether to believe that p. To show this, I reconsider the role of the concept of belief in doxastic deliberation, and I defuse 'the teleologian's dilemma'.
Original languageEnglish
JournalThe Philosophical Quarterly
Volume56
Pages (from-to)499-516
Number of pages17
Publication statusPublished - 2006

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

ID: 8580871