Andreas Roepstorff

Detecting deception: the scope and limits.

Research output: Contribution to journal/Conference contribution in journal/Contribution to newspaperJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • SipTiCS

    Submitted manuscript, 327 KB, PDF document

DOI

  • Section for Anthropology and Ethnography
  • Section for Linguistics
  • Center for Functionally Integrative Neuroscience
With the increasing interest in the neuroimaging of deception and its commercial application, there is a need to pay more attention to methodology. The weakness of studying deception in an experimental setting has been discussed intensively for over half a century. However, even though much effort has been put into their development, paradigms are still inadequate. The problems that bedevilled the old technology have not been eliminated by the new. Advances will only be possible if experiments are designed that take account of the intentions of the subject and the context in which these occur.
Original languageEnglish
JournalTrends in Cognitive Sciences
Volume12
Issue2
Pages (from-to)48-53
Number of pages5
ISSN1364-6613
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Research areas

  • deception, interaction, neuroimaging

See relations at Aarhus University Citationformats

Download statistics

No data available

ID: 10324002