When Do Citizens Consider Political Parties Legitimate?

Ann Kristin Kölln*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Research on negative partisanship and affective polarization shows that wholesale rejections of individual parties are a common and growing phenomenon. This article offers a novel perspective on assessments of parties by considering citizens' legitimacy perceptions of political parties as institutional players. Combining research on political parties and public opinion, I develop a theoretical framework that explains how parties' characteristics shape their perception as legitimate institutional players. I argue that governing experience, age, ideology, and democratic behaviour provide informational cues to citizens about how democratically dangerous a party is. To test my argument, I fielded a cross-sectional survey in seven West European countries and a large-scale survey experiment. The results consistently show that citizens use party-level cues such as ideological moderation and democratic behaviour to form party legitimacy perceptions. The findings have important public opinion implications for political parties and their institutional role in democracies.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBritish Journal of Political Science
Vol/bind54
Nummer1
Sider (fra-til)110-128
Antal sider19
ISSN0007-1234
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'When Do Citizens Consider Political Parties Legitimate?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater