-
Uddannelse
Find uddannelse
Studievejledning
Kvalitet
- Forskning
-
Samarbejde
Virksomheder
Kommuner og regioner
Gymnasier
Myndigheder
-
Om AU
Organisation
Kontakt
Om AU
- Organisation
- Ledelse
- Strategi
- AU i tal
- AU's historie
- Internationalt samarbejde
- Bæredygtighed
- Campus 2.0
- Diversitet og ligestilling
- Ledige stillinger
- Presse
- Kontakt
What’s in a name? Perceptions and promotion of responsible research and innovation practices across Europe
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Dokumenter
- What’s in a name_Accepted manuscript_2020
Accepteret manuskript, 511 KB, PDF-dokument
DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa018
Forlagets udgivne version
- Malene Vinther Christensen ,
- Mika Nieminen, VTT Technical Research Center Finland, Finland
- Marlene Altenhofer, Rand Europe ,
- Elise Tancoigne, University of Geneva, Universite de Marne-La-Vallee ,
- Niels Mejlgaard
- Erich Griessler, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna, Østrig
- Adolf Filacek, Czech Academy of Sciences
After a decade of efforts to mainstream Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) across Europe, the policy momentum is now uncertain. We explore how 217 organisations perceive responsibility in relation to their work, what mechanisms they apply to promote responsible practices, and what hindrances to promoting RRI they observe. Most organisations are unfamiliar with RRI but employ diverse perceptions of responsibility and mechanisms to promote it nonetheless. Civil society organisations are primarily outward oriented; collaborating with others and hosting science events. Private companies are more internally focussed and more likely to formalise this effort in strategies and internal guidelines. Universities resemble private companies, while private and public funders use funding-specific tools to incentivise responsible practices. Our results suggest that RRI is still poorly institutionalised and that some areas lack attention among actors in the research and innovation systems. Future policy endeavours might benefit from addressing deficits and tapping into existing perceptions of responsibility.
| Originalsprog | Dansk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | Science and Public Policy |
| Vol/bind | 47 |
| Nummer | 3 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 360-370 |
| Antal sider | 11 |
| ISSN | 0302-3427 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - jun. 2020 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
Download-statistik
ID: 190437012