-
Uddannelse
Find uddannelse
Studievejledning
Kvalitet
- Forskning
-
Samarbejde
Virksomheder
Kommuner og regioner
Gymnasier
Myndigheder
-
Om AU
Organisation
Kontakt
Om AU
- Organisation
- Ledelse
- Strategi
- AU i tal
- AU's historie
- Internationalt samarbejde
- Bæredygtighed
- Campus 2.0
- Diversitet og ligestilling
- Ledige stillinger
- Presse
- Kontakt
What Object-Oriented Programming Was Supposed to Be: Two Grumpy Old Guys’ Take on Object-Oriented Programming
Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceeding › Konferencebidrag i proceedings › Forskning › peer review
DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1145/3563835.3568735
Forlagets udgivne version
- Ole Lehrmann Madsen
- Birger Møller-Pedersen, University of Oslo, Norge
Object-oriented programming has been around for more
than 50 years and is now the most dominant style of
programming. In recent years there has been an increasing
criticism of object-oriented programming. Some people
argue that the mainstream object-oriented languages do
not capture the intentions of object-orientation as intended
by its founding fathers. There are indeed issues with objectorientation
as practiced by mainstream. In this essay, we
identify a number of issues that we think are problematic.
We argue that the primary reason for these issues is that
reuse is considered the main advantage of objectorientation
at the expense of modeling. We argue that
modeling should be the main focus, that programming is
modeling, and we describe a number of principles to follow
when practicing object-oriented modeling.
than 50 years and is now the most dominant style of
programming. In recent years there has been an increasing
criticism of object-oriented programming. Some people
argue that the mainstream object-oriented languages do
not capture the intentions of object-orientation as intended
by its founding fathers. There are indeed issues with objectorientation
as practiced by mainstream. In this essay, we
identify a number of issues that we think are problematic.
We argue that the primary reason for these issues is that
reuse is considered the main advantage of objectorientation
at the expense of modeling. We argue that
modeling should be the main focus, that programming is
modeling, and we describe a number of principles to follow
when practicing object-oriented modeling.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Titel | Onward! 2022 : Proceedings of the 2022 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software |
| Antal sider | 20 |
| Forlag | Association for Computing Machinery |
| Udgivelsesår | 2 dec. 2022 |
| Sider | 220–239 |
| ISBN (trykt) | 978-1-4503-9909-8 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2 dec. 2022 |
| Begivenhed | Onward! '22: 2022 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software - Auckland, New Zealand Varighed: 8 dec. 2022 → 10 dec. 2022 |
Konference
| Konference | Onward! '22: 2022 ACM SIGPLAN International Symposium on New Ideas, New Paradigms, and Reflections on Programming and Software |
|---|---|
| Land | New Zealand |
| By | Auckland |
| Periode | 08/12/2022 → 10/12/2022 |
- Object-oriented programming, Modeling, Reuse, programming
Forskningsområder
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
ID: 297786949