Abstract
I respond to Scerri’s recent reply to my claim that there was a scientific revolution in chemistry in the early 20th Century. I grant, as Scerri insists, that there are significant continuities through the change about which we are arguing. That is so in all scientific revolutions. But I argue that the changes were such that they constitute a Kuhnian revolution, not in the classic sense of The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, but in the sense of Kuhn’s mature theory, developed in the 1980s and early 1990s.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical, Educational and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry |
Vol/bind | 24 |
Nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 161-170 |
Antal sider | 10 |
ISSN | 1386-4238 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - jul. 2022 |