-
Uddannelse
Find uddannelse
Studievejledning
Kvalitet
- Forskning
-
Samarbejde
Virksomheder
Kommuner og regioner
Gymnasier
Myndigheder
-
Om AU
Organisation
Kontakt
Om AU
- Organisation
- Ledelse
- Strategi
- AU i tal
- AU's historie
- Internationalt samarbejde
- Bæredygtighed
- Campus 2.0
- Diversitet og ligestilling
- Ledige stillinger
- Presse
- Kontakt
Ulva fenestrata protein – Comparison of three extraction methods with respect to protein yield and protein quality
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Dokumenter
- 1-s2.0-S2211926421003155-main
Forlagets udgivne version, 983 KB, PDF-dokument
DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.algal.2021.102496
Forlagets udgivne version
- L. Juul
- M. Danielsen
- C. Nebel
- S. Steinhagen, University of Gothenburg ,
- A. Bruhn
- S. K. Jensen
- I. Undeland, Chalmers University of Technology ,
- T. K. Dalsgaard
Seaweed is gaining attention as a possible alternative and sustainable source of proteins. This study investigates three protein extraction methods and their effect on protein yield and quality when applied to Ulva fenestrata. Two of the methods included alkaline extractions (pH-shifts); one version solubilizing the proteins at pH 8.5 and one solubilizing them at pH 8.5 followed by pH 12 (pH 8.5 + 12). The third method was a mechanical pressing, using a double screw press. All extraction methods were followed by isoelectric precipitation to concentrate the proteins. Extraction at pH 8.5 gave the significantly highest total protein yield after the isoelectric precipitation, followed by extraction at pH 8.5 + 12 and lastly mechanical extraction gave the lowest yield. Proteins extracted with both alkaline methods had a significantly higher solubility at pH 7 and pH 9, compared to proteins from the mechanical pressing. There were no significant differences between the three methods in total D/L-amino acid ratio. Amino acid cross-links measured as lysinoalanine (LAL) and lanthionine (LAN) where found in significantly higher amounts in alkali-extracted proteins compared to mechanically extracted, however not to a degree that expect to compromise functional or nutritional quality. Further, no significant difference in protein in vitro digestibility was found between extraction methods. In conclusion, results indicated that protein extraction at pH 8.5 can be recommended, especially regarding total protein yield and solubility of the final protein extract.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Artikelnummer | 102496 |
| Tidsskrift | Algal Research |
| Vol/bind | 60 |
| ISSN | 2211-9264 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - dec. 2021 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
Download-statistik
ID: 223985683