Training Thoracic Ultrasound Skills: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Simulation-Based Training versus Training on Healthy Volunteers

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Pia Iben Pietersen, Syddansk Universitet
  • ,
  • Rasmus Jørgensen, Syddansk Universitet, Regional Center for Technical Simulation
  • ,
  • Ole Graumann, Institute of Clinical Research, Syddansk Universitet
  • ,
  • Lars Konge, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation
  • ,
  • Søren Helbo Skaarup
  • Hans Henrik Lawaetz Schultz, Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Københavns Universitet
  • ,
  • Christian B. Laursen, Syddansk Universitet, Institute of Clinical Research

Introduction: As ultrasound becomes more accessible, the use of point-of-care ultrasound examinations performed by clinicians has increased. Sufficient theoretical and practical skills are prerequisites to integrate thoracic ultrasound into a clinical setting and to use it as supplement in the clinical decision-making. Recommendations on how to educate and train clinicians for these ultrasound examinations are debated, and simulation-based training may improve clinical performance. Objectives: The aim of this study was to explore the effect of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound compared to training on healthy volunteers. Method: A total of 66 physicians with no previous experience in thoracic ultrasound completed a training program and assessment of competences from November 2018 to May 2019. After a theoretical session in ultrasound physics, sonoanatomy, and thoracic ultrasound, the physicians were randomized into one of three groups for practical training: (1) simulation-based training, (2) training on a healthy volunteer, or (3) no training (control group). Primary outcome was difference in the clinical performance score after the training period. Results: Using a multiple comparison, ANOVA with Bonferroni correction for multiplicity, there was no statistical significant difference between the two trained groups' performance score: 45.1 points versus 41.9 points (minimum 17 points, maximum 68 points; p = 0.38). The simulation-based training group scored significantly higher than the control group without hands-on training, 36.7 points (p = 0.009). Conclusions: The use of simulation-based training in thoracic ultrasound does not improve the clinical performance score compared to conventional training on healthy volunteers. As focused, thoracic ultrasound is a relatively uncomplicated practical procedure when taught; focus should mainly be on the theoretical part and the supervised clinical training in a curriculum. However, simulation can be used instead or as an add-on to training on simulated patients.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftRespiration
Vol/bind100
Nummer1
Sider (fra-til)34-43
ISSN0025-7931
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Copyright:
Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 214065270