Aarhus Universitets segl

Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process. / Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Axsen, Jonn; Delina, Laurence L. et al.

I: Energy Research and Social Science, Bind 89, 102675, 07.2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Sovacool, BK, Axsen, J, Delina, LL, Boudet, HS, Rai, V, Sidortsov, R, Churchill, SA, Jenkins, KEH & Galvin, R 2022, 'Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process', Energy Research and Social Science, bind 89, 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

APA

Sovacool, B. K., Axsen, J., Delina, L. L., Boudet, H. S., Rai, V., Sidortsov, R., Churchill, S. A., Jenkins, K. E. H., & Galvin, R. (2022). Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process. Energy Research and Social Science, 89, [102675]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

CBE

Sovacool BK, Axsen J, Delina LL, Boudet HS, Rai V, Sidortsov R, Churchill SA, Jenkins KEH, Galvin R. 2022. Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process. Energy Research and Social Science. 89:Article 102675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

MLA

Vancouver

Sovacool BK, Axsen J, Delina LL, Boudet HS, Rai V, Sidortsov R et al. Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process. Energy Research and Social Science. 2022 jul.;89:102675. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

Author

Sovacool, Benjamin K. ; Axsen, Jonn ; Delina, Laurence L. et al. / Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process. I: Energy Research and Social Science. 2022 ; Bind 89.

Bibtex

@article{41b1108cd257465c9d5bc838323577d6,
title = "Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process",
abstract = "Peer review is the bedrock of modern academic research and its lasting contributions to science and society. And yet, reviewers can submit “poor” peer review reports, authors can blatantly ignore referee advice, and editors can contravene and undermine the peer review process itself. In this paper, we, the Editors of Energy Research & Social Science (ER&SS), seek to establish peer review codes of practice for the general energy and social science research community. We include suggestions for three of the most important roles: peer reviewers or referees, editors, and authors. We base our 33 recommendations on a collective 60 years of editorial experience at ER&SS. Our hope is that such codes of practice can enable the academic community to navigate the peer review process more effectively, more meaningfully, and more efficiently.",
keywords = "Academic practice, Authors, Codes of conduct, Editors, Misconduct, Peer reviewers",
author = "Sovacool, {Benjamin K.} and Jonn Axsen and Delina, {Laurence L.} and Boudet, {Hilary Schaffer} and Varun Rai and Roman Sidortsov and Churchill, {Sefa Awaworyi} and Jenkins, {Kirsten E.H.} and Ray Galvin",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Author(s)",
year = "2022",
month = jul,
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
journal = "Energy Research & Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Towards codes of practice for navigating the academic peer review process

AU - Sovacool, Benjamin K.

AU - Axsen, Jonn

AU - Delina, Laurence L.

AU - Boudet, Hilary Schaffer

AU - Rai, Varun

AU - Sidortsov, Roman

AU - Churchill, Sefa Awaworyi

AU - Jenkins, Kirsten E.H.

AU - Galvin, Ray

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Author(s)

PY - 2022/7

Y1 - 2022/7

N2 - Peer review is the bedrock of modern academic research and its lasting contributions to science and society. And yet, reviewers can submit “poor” peer review reports, authors can blatantly ignore referee advice, and editors can contravene and undermine the peer review process itself. In this paper, we, the Editors of Energy Research & Social Science (ER&SS), seek to establish peer review codes of practice for the general energy and social science research community. We include suggestions for three of the most important roles: peer reviewers or referees, editors, and authors. We base our 33 recommendations on a collective 60 years of editorial experience at ER&SS. Our hope is that such codes of practice can enable the academic community to navigate the peer review process more effectively, more meaningfully, and more efficiently.

AB - Peer review is the bedrock of modern academic research and its lasting contributions to science and society. And yet, reviewers can submit “poor” peer review reports, authors can blatantly ignore referee advice, and editors can contravene and undermine the peer review process itself. In this paper, we, the Editors of Energy Research & Social Science (ER&SS), seek to establish peer review codes of practice for the general energy and social science research community. We include suggestions for three of the most important roles: peer reviewers or referees, editors, and authors. We base our 33 recommendations on a collective 60 years of editorial experience at ER&SS. Our hope is that such codes of practice can enable the academic community to navigate the peer review process more effectively, more meaningfully, and more efficiently.

KW - Academic practice

KW - Authors

KW - Codes of conduct

KW - Editors

KW - Misconduct

KW - Peer reviewers

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85131412494&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102675

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85131412494

VL - 89

JO - Energy Research & Social Science

JF - Energy Research & Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

M1 - 102675

ER -