Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Theory and practice in the workshop : using the gap. / Haastrup, Lisbeth; Knudsen, Lars Emmerik Damgaard (Redaktør).
I: Nordic Psychology, Bind 67, Nr. 2, 02.06.2015, s. 117-135.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Theory and practice in the workshop
T2 - using the gap
AU - Haastrup, Lisbeth
A2 - Knudsen, Lars Emmerik Damgaard
PY - 2015/6/2
Y1 - 2015/6/2
N2 - AbstractThe ways the relationship between theory and practice is understood and implemented in studyprogrammes is a question that has been posed since antiquity, and that the Bologna processand the reform of the professional bachelor programme problem have intensified also inDenmark. Professional bachelor programmes have become increasingly abstract, and theindividual educational institutions have been merged into university colleges [Undervisningsministeriet(2007). Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor som læreri folkeskolen. BEK nr 219 af 12/03/2007. Ministry of Education. Proclamation of ProfessionalBachelor Teacher Education Programme. Retrieved May 2014 from, https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=25302]. In this article, we reflect on the epistemologicalchallenges we faced during a research project on the correlation between theory and practiceand drop-out rates at four professional bachelor programmes in Denmark. Our point ofdeparture was to view theory and practice as across time and place. But the contrasts among thefour programmes made it clear to us that the various understandings of the relations betweentheory and practice that we observed had to be seen as mixed cultural practices undergoing aprocess of change. The concepts of theory and practice, the places, the academic content andteaching methods, and knowledge forms we observed were mutually interdependent, andfought for recognition as central to the way in which professional bachelor programmes werereproduced and transformed. In this article, we use the comprehensive transformationprocesses of professional bachelor programmes as reasons for reframing/restating questionsregarding theory and practice in which theory and practice are viewed as cultural forms ineducation and professional practice. We suggest an actual didactics of theory–practice as partof professional bachelor programme practice for lecturers, students and supervisors.
AB - AbstractThe ways the relationship between theory and practice is understood and implemented in studyprogrammes is a question that has been posed since antiquity, and that the Bologna processand the reform of the professional bachelor programme problem have intensified also inDenmark. Professional bachelor programmes have become increasingly abstract, and theindividual educational institutions have been merged into university colleges [Undervisningsministeriet(2007). Bekendtgørelse om uddannelsen til professionsbachelor som læreri folkeskolen. BEK nr 219 af 12/03/2007. Ministry of Education. Proclamation of ProfessionalBachelor Teacher Education Programme. Retrieved May 2014 from, https://www.retsinformation.dk/Forms/R0710.aspx?id=25302]. In this article, we reflect on the epistemologicalchallenges we faced during a research project on the correlation between theory and practiceand drop-out rates at four professional bachelor programmes in Denmark. Our point ofdeparture was to view theory and practice as across time and place. But the contrasts among thefour programmes made it clear to us that the various understandings of the relations betweentheory and practice that we observed had to be seen as mixed cultural practices undergoing aprocess of change. The concepts of theory and practice, the places, the academic content andteaching methods, and knowledge forms we observed were mutually interdependent, andfought for recognition as central to the way in which professional bachelor programmes werereproduced and transformed. In this article, we use the comprehensive transformationprocesses of professional bachelor programmes as reasons for reframing/restating questionsregarding theory and practice in which theory and practice are viewed as cultural forms ineducation and professional practice. We suggest an actual didactics of theory–practice as partof professional bachelor programme practice for lecturers, students and supervisors.
KW - Theory and practice
KW - Material Culture
KW - Materiel kultur
KW - Theory and practice
KW - Cultural analysis
KW - Materiel kultur
U2 - 10.1080/19012276.2015.1031959
DO - 10.1080/19012276.2015.1031959
M3 - Journal article
VL - 67
SP - 117
EP - 135
JO - Nordic Psychology
JF - Nordic Psychology
SN - 1904-0016
IS - 2
ER -