Aarhus Universitets segl

The “whole systems” energy sustainability of digitalization: Humanizing the community risks and benefits of Nordic datacenter development

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

The “whole systems” energy sustainability of digitalization : Humanizing the community risks and benefits of Nordic datacenter development. / Sovacool, Benjamin K.; Upham, Paul; Monyei, Chukwuka G.

I: Energy Research and Social Science, Bind 88, 102493, 06.2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Sovacool BK, Upham P, Monyei CG. The “whole systems” energy sustainability of digitalization: Humanizing the community risks and benefits of Nordic datacenter development. Energy Research and Social Science. 2022 jun.;88:102493. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102493

Author

Bibtex

@article{e41faf2005c84db8a36a2ce9b581a7ca,
title = "The “whole systems” energy sustainability of digitalization: Humanizing the community risks and benefits of Nordic datacenter development",
abstract = "Digital platforms and the online services that they provide have become an indispensable and ubiquitous part of modern lifestyles, mediating our jobs, hobbies, patterns of consumption and forms of communication. However, no one is steering this development, or closely looking at the impacts that it may have on remote communities in the Arctic and Nordic region, a hotspot for datacenter development. Moreover, unlike other areas of energy consumption or technology adoption prone to rich, qualitative assessments, such work on datacenters involving local stakeholders and environmental concerns is less common, particularly at a larger scale. In this study, based on novel mixed methods—including corporate data, expert interviews, focus groups, and extensive site visits—across three countries, we offer a geographically and technologically bounded assessment looking at the sustainability impacts of datacenters on local communities. We ask: What impacts are occurring as part of datacenter development or planning proposals in Greenland, Iceland, and Norway? What is the actual and anticipated scale of those impacts on local Arctic communities? Finally, what impacts to datacenter development occur at the “whole systems” level? We examine not only impacts onsite at existing or proposed datacenters, but an entire range of consequences including the manufacturing of equipment, the laying of data cables, the construction of buildings, and issues of the dark web, cryptocurrency mining, hacking, spying, waste and decommissioning. Moreover, we humanize risks and benefits not only across scales, but also categorical types, including local impacts such as boom and bust cycles, the displacement of indigenous groups for land – particularly for power supply - and impacts on employment, especially after datacenters may close.",
keywords = "Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency mining, Datacenters, Greenland, Iceland, Norway, Server farms, Sustainable development goals",
author = "Sovacool, {Benjamin K.} and Paul Upham and Monyei, {Chukwuka G.}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 The Authors",
year = "2022",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1016/j.erss.2022.102493",
language = "English",
volume = "88",
journal = "Energy Research & Social Science",
issn = "2214-6296",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The “whole systems” energy sustainability of digitalization

T2 - Humanizing the community risks and benefits of Nordic datacenter development

AU - Sovacool, Benjamin K.

AU - Upham, Paul

AU - Monyei, Chukwuka G.

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors

PY - 2022/6

Y1 - 2022/6

N2 - Digital platforms and the online services that they provide have become an indispensable and ubiquitous part of modern lifestyles, mediating our jobs, hobbies, patterns of consumption and forms of communication. However, no one is steering this development, or closely looking at the impacts that it may have on remote communities in the Arctic and Nordic region, a hotspot for datacenter development. Moreover, unlike other areas of energy consumption or technology adoption prone to rich, qualitative assessments, such work on datacenters involving local stakeholders and environmental concerns is less common, particularly at a larger scale. In this study, based on novel mixed methods—including corporate data, expert interviews, focus groups, and extensive site visits—across three countries, we offer a geographically and technologically bounded assessment looking at the sustainability impacts of datacenters on local communities. We ask: What impacts are occurring as part of datacenter development or planning proposals in Greenland, Iceland, and Norway? What is the actual and anticipated scale of those impacts on local Arctic communities? Finally, what impacts to datacenter development occur at the “whole systems” level? We examine not only impacts onsite at existing or proposed datacenters, but an entire range of consequences including the manufacturing of equipment, the laying of data cables, the construction of buildings, and issues of the dark web, cryptocurrency mining, hacking, spying, waste and decommissioning. Moreover, we humanize risks and benefits not only across scales, but also categorical types, including local impacts such as boom and bust cycles, the displacement of indigenous groups for land – particularly for power supply - and impacts on employment, especially after datacenters may close.

AB - Digital platforms and the online services that they provide have become an indispensable and ubiquitous part of modern lifestyles, mediating our jobs, hobbies, patterns of consumption and forms of communication. However, no one is steering this development, or closely looking at the impacts that it may have on remote communities in the Arctic and Nordic region, a hotspot for datacenter development. Moreover, unlike other areas of energy consumption or technology adoption prone to rich, qualitative assessments, such work on datacenters involving local stakeholders and environmental concerns is less common, particularly at a larger scale. In this study, based on novel mixed methods—including corporate data, expert interviews, focus groups, and extensive site visits—across three countries, we offer a geographically and technologically bounded assessment looking at the sustainability impacts of datacenters on local communities. We ask: What impacts are occurring as part of datacenter development or planning proposals in Greenland, Iceland, and Norway? What is the actual and anticipated scale of those impacts on local Arctic communities? Finally, what impacts to datacenter development occur at the “whole systems” level? We examine not only impacts onsite at existing or proposed datacenters, but an entire range of consequences including the manufacturing of equipment, the laying of data cables, the construction of buildings, and issues of the dark web, cryptocurrency mining, hacking, spying, waste and decommissioning. Moreover, we humanize risks and benefits not only across scales, but also categorical types, including local impacts such as boom and bust cycles, the displacement of indigenous groups for land – particularly for power supply - and impacts on employment, especially after datacenters may close.

KW - Bitcoin

KW - Cryptocurrency mining

KW - Datacenters

KW - Greenland

KW - Iceland

KW - Norway

KW - Server farms

KW - Sustainable development goals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85122837108&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102493

DO - 10.1016/j.erss.2022.102493

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85122837108

VL - 88

JO - Energy Research & Social Science

JF - Energy Research & Social Science

SN - 2214-6296

M1 - 102493

ER -