Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

The Same, but Better: Understanding the Practice of Designing for Incremental Innovation in Web Design

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

The Same, but Better: Understanding the Practice of Designing for Incremental Innovation in Web Design. / Biskjaer, Michael Mose; Dalsgaard, Peter; Halskov, Kim.

I: International Journal of Design, Bind 13, Nr. 3, 12.2019, s. 89-104.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{124cb8531baf424da287becd619c1e43,
title = "The Same, but Better: Understanding the Practice of Designing for Incremental Innovation in Web Design",
abstract = "Although the vast majority of new products are incremental innovations, radical innovation still attracts the most attention from design researchers and practitioners. We examine the frequently overlooked practice of designing explicitly for incremental innovation as the bread-and-butter work for most professional designers. Informed by a broad literature review of incremental and radical innovation, we report a qualitative case study of a leading European digital design agency tasked with designing a {\textquoteleft}same, but better{\textquoteright} product—a global subsidiary company website. Based on three rounds of coding of five videorecorded design meetings, we contribute a model showing how the observed digital designers purposely delimited radical innovation by managing six critical forces that constrained their design space. These forces are client, customer, competitor, catalogue, content, and context. Our {\textquoteleft}six C{\textquoteright} model can be used by design researchers to articulate and analyze incremental innovation in design processes and by professional digital designers to improve their understanding of how to best manage incrementally innovative web design projects. We discuss how our six C model complements previous contributions, and we suggest avenues for future work.",
keywords = "Six C model, Radical innovation, Incremental innovation, Case study, Web design",
author = "Biskjaer, {Michael Mose} and Peter Dalsgaard and Kim Halskov",
year = "2019",
month = dec,
language = "English",
volume = "13",
pages = "89--104",
journal = "International Journal of Design",
issn = "1991-3761",
publisher = "National Taiwan University of Science and Technology",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Same, but Better: Understanding the Practice of Designing for Incremental Innovation in Web Design

AU - Biskjaer, Michael Mose

AU - Dalsgaard, Peter

AU - Halskov, Kim

PY - 2019/12

Y1 - 2019/12

N2 - Although the vast majority of new products are incremental innovations, radical innovation still attracts the most attention from design researchers and practitioners. We examine the frequently overlooked practice of designing explicitly for incremental innovation as the bread-and-butter work for most professional designers. Informed by a broad literature review of incremental and radical innovation, we report a qualitative case study of a leading European digital design agency tasked with designing a ‘same, but better’ product—a global subsidiary company website. Based on three rounds of coding of five videorecorded design meetings, we contribute a model showing how the observed digital designers purposely delimited radical innovation by managing six critical forces that constrained their design space. These forces are client, customer, competitor, catalogue, content, and context. Our ‘six C’ model can be used by design researchers to articulate and analyze incremental innovation in design processes and by professional digital designers to improve their understanding of how to best manage incrementally innovative web design projects. We discuss how our six C model complements previous contributions, and we suggest avenues for future work.

AB - Although the vast majority of new products are incremental innovations, radical innovation still attracts the most attention from design researchers and practitioners. We examine the frequently overlooked practice of designing explicitly for incremental innovation as the bread-and-butter work for most professional designers. Informed by a broad literature review of incremental and radical innovation, we report a qualitative case study of a leading European digital design agency tasked with designing a ‘same, but better’ product—a global subsidiary company website. Based on three rounds of coding of five videorecorded design meetings, we contribute a model showing how the observed digital designers purposely delimited radical innovation by managing six critical forces that constrained their design space. These forces are client, customer, competitor, catalogue, content, and context. Our ‘six C’ model can be used by design researchers to articulate and analyze incremental innovation in design processes and by professional digital designers to improve their understanding of how to best manage incrementally innovative web design projects. We discuss how our six C model complements previous contributions, and we suggest avenues for future work.

KW - Six C model

KW - Radical innovation

KW - Incremental innovation

KW - Case study

KW - Web design

M3 - Journal article

VL - 13

SP - 89

EP - 104

JO - International Journal of Design

JF - International Journal of Design

SN - 1991-3761

IS - 3

ER -