The Orwellian Dimension of Scientific Progress: from Part III - Incommensurability, Progress, and Revolutions

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

Abstract

Kuhn claims after a revolutionary change of theory, scientists need to write new textbooks to incorporate the new theoretical perspective. The revisions do not merely involve the addition of the new discoveries. The task involves some rewriting of the history of the discipline. Kuhn suggests there are parallels to Orwell’s 1984. The “new” history of a scientific field is written to emphasize the continuity through the change. I examine the role Kuhn’s comparison to 1984 plays in his argument, and the significance of the rewriting of a discipline’s history after a change of theory. The process tells us something about both how scientists are trained to work effectively, and the nature of the changes that occur during a scientific revolution.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelKuhn's The Structure of Scientific Revolutions at 60
RedaktørerK. Brad Wray
UdgivelsesstedCambridge
ForlagCambridge University Press
Publikationsdatojan. 2024
Sider182-196
Kapitel10
ISBN (Trykt)9781009100700
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781009122696
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2024
NavnCambridge Philosophical Anniversaries

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The Orwellian Dimension of Scientific Progress: from Part III - Incommensurability, Progress, and Revolutions'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater